You might be right concerning the STH, but I think that the attendance is influenced much more strongly by the winning streak than by the STH.Keep in mind that teams like yours are privileged in this game.I see you have an overall transfer balance of -5M€!Mine is +1.4M€ and it is barely enough to stay on track.
but remember that teams need money to come up with teams like yours. and getting the money in lower divisions didn' get easier in the last seasons! i am still working on it!and i don't understand your argumentation about reflecting of the transferbalance. could you explain that to me?
I have a profit of 36k pr. week right now. That means I have to stop in my tracks, unable to get better. Where is the point in that. Lay down and stop winning?
I currently have a team in the same conference as Danish Lakers. I am trying to catch up to him, and I think I will be at his level in some seasons. I have profit of more than 200k a week, mainly because I have a relatively low salary. I think there should be a gap, but I don't think it has to be widening exponentially (I know don't want this either just making it clear). If the best team, whether it's Danish Lakers, BC Törööö, Sharman Globetrotter etc. if they didn't make any mistakes the teams behind shouldn't be able to catch up. Even if they played perfectly. On the other hand if the top teams made just the smallest mistake, it would make it possible for the other teams to catch up. The top teams shouldn't have a larger margin of mistakes just because they are ahead.I hope my post makes sense. Just wanted to share my opinion.
I have a profit of 36k pr. week right now. That means I have to stop in my tracks, unable to get better. Where is the point in that. Lay down and stop winning?you were complaining about this.My team (and i am not an exception) has barely had a weekly profit in the last 2-3 seasons. And do not get till the cup or the playoff finals (meaning that I have 3 weeks a season without income).So yes, maybe it's time for you too to "enjoy" the "where is my money?" part.But don't worry, you still make more (or lose less) money than your opponents
I currently have a team in the same conference as Danish Lakers. I am trying to catch up to him, and I think I will be at his level in some seasons. I have profit of more than 200k a week, mainly because I have a relatively low salary. I think there should be a gap, but I don't think it has to be widening exponentially (I know don't want this either just making it clear). If the best team, whether it's Danish Lakers, BC Törööö, Sharman Globetrotter etc. if they didn't make any mistakes the teams behind shouldn't be able to catch up. Even if they played perfectly. On the other hand if the top teams made just the smallest mistake, it would make it possible for the other teams to catch up. The top teams shouldn't have a larger margin of mistakes just because they are ahead.I hope my post makes sense. Just wanted to share my opinion.I think we're on the same page on this one. You will have a top team. You are doing great and have worked your way up. You can collect funds now with low salery and when you have collected enough. You can make a run and wait for my mistakes like you wrote. Untill then, I will expect you to fight with everything you got to knock me off. But I still think I should have way more fans and attendance than you based on the last 3 seasons wich is again my original post topic. I look foward to the challenge as I see that you do indeed have a great potential!