BuzzerBeater Forums

Like I said, there are lower leagues where the BB player listed as Guard can easily be better than a Forwar or Center (just like in RL). But you do not see any 6'5 C-s or 7'4 PG in the top leagues (just like in RL).

What I am trying to point out is not the physical part of the game, but the mental. Why is it given that they already know how to run those offenses? And why do they know what and where to take the shots? This game should be just as mental as it is physical. My thing is that if you know or skilled to play a type of offense, why not get a boost.

Every basketball player can play in any offence. His experience determines how good he is in his decision making. Experience skill is present in BB. Still if you put a player with atrocius passing to PG spot and try to run Motion. He is going to make more turnovers, than passes. Perhaps if he has good exp, he tryes to shove the ball to SG and make him run the offence more.

But what I want to play doesn't matter.
I only said that it will be funny if player with IS=1 and JS=20 + JR =20 has bonus for LI. It doesn't matter who is owner of this player, he has to play in some club.
Skill are enogut to determine how good is player to play in specific tactic. So Your new parameter changes nothing. If player has IS + 1 instead of IS -1 it works exactly the same as ability bonus to play LI. So we don't need new parameter..

Every basketball player can play in any offence. His experience determines how good he is in his decision making. Experience skill is present in BB. Still if you put a player with atrocius passing to PG spot and try to run Motion. He is going to make more turnovers, than passes. Perhaps if he has good exp, he tryes to shove the ball to SG and make him run the offence more.

Not every player can play in any offense. Sometimes they just dont understand it. I will give an example with what happened with on one of my fav teams. Player A( pretty athletic and fast) was starting at SF and for some reason he was not scoring as much when he got the ball. Let me say that he was getting the ball quite often. The team was playing a half court type of offense( more or less patient). Soon there after he was benched and then traded. On his new team he started on, they ran a RnG type offense and he was scoring 15pts a game. He has the same ability as both teams but the offense was different. He ran the RnG in college so he is more comfortable with that offense.

But is it a given that the point guard would do that? I am not asking about the game engine, but is it that a PG with respectable passing and strong exp better than a player with prolific passing and inept exp in decision making+ passing?

I only said that it will be funny if player with IS=1 and JS=20 + JR =20 has bonus for LI. It doesn't matter who is owner of this player, he has to play in some club.
Skill are enogut to determine how good is player to play in specific tactic. So Your new parameter changes nothing. If player has IS + 1 instead of IS -1 it works exactly the same as ability bonus to play LI. So we don't need new parameter..

That would be funny, but what I am getting at is a player playing to their strengths. More or less with skills that high, the player would more than likely play where you can shoot form mid to long range. It doesn't make sense for a player to do anything other than that.

Skill only points out skill of the player not what they can play according to those skills. IS +1 only means that they can shoot better, not run the offense better.

But is it a given that the point guard would do that? I am not asking about the game engine, but is it that a PG with respectable passing and strong exp better than a player with prolific passing and inept exp in decision making+ passing?

decision making the xp dude, passing the skilled dude.

Experience is somehow the stoichastic brain of the player, is it better to shot now or did we have enough time to get a better shot or when i pass now Player X has a better shot. So the experienced PG would make more often the right decision of those three points, especially in close cases. The skilled dude, will raise the chanche of getting a better shot at the attack time and especially will give teammates better positions with his pass but will take sometimes a shoot when it better to pass or to wait.

Team never has a prefered tactic. Coach has a prefered tactic. The easiest solution would be adding a coach with different specialitys and levels. But this would prolly be a major change. Without a doubt this coach should have a increasing salary, so you can not just hire P.Jackson and have him forever...