BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > NFL Talk

NFL Talk

Set priority
Show messages by
From: tough

This Post:
00
220571.45 in reply to 220571.44
Date: 7/7/2012 3:59:20 AM
Mountain Eagles
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
763763
Second Team:
Ric Flair Drippers
I expect the NFC West like this:

Rams 4-12

Cardinals 7-9

Seahawks 9-7

49ers 11-5

It's very competitive. If Kolb improves, won't be surprised to see Arizona in the PO picture in the end. If Seattle can get all the pieces assorted, they could win the division if everything goes right. (With Flynn)

3 Time NBBA Champion. Certified Trainer. Mentor. Have any questions? Feel free to shoot me a BB-Mail!
This Post:
00
220571.46 in reply to 220571.44
Date: 7/7/2012 6:55:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
When has the NFL ever prohibited anyone from playing ever?


There have been instances...

Doctors gave Peyton toe OK to play again so the Commish can not be held liable for anything that happens to him. No one has ever been "Forced to retire" and Manning won't be either. He sells too many tickets and merchandise for that to be a consideration. As far as the change in the Broncos record, they play in what is now the weakest division in football since my NFC West has progressed last year. I cant say what their record will be but there is a good chance they make it to the playoffs since the Chargers can never seem to keep it together. My team, the 49ers did good not to get Manning in my opinion, not that they ever really had a chance. I would rather have Alex Smith. I was thinking wjen Smith was talking to Miami and Manning was talking to SF that if we couldn't get either one I would love to have Tebow if Manning went to Denver. Anyways, as far as the record change goes I'm expecting no better than 9-7. If the Broncos go 11-5 I will eat my words and never have an opinion about football again because to me, Denver's failure next year is a given.


In all honesty... there are several comments in there that just baffle me.
Preferring Alex Smith over Manning...
Hoping to land Tebow....
Those 2 comments there just baffle me...

But, as you manned up, so will I. If Tim Tebow, does anything similar to last year for the Jets after he forcibly takes Sanchez' spot... I will eat my words and never have an opinion about football again.

From: a-o
This Post:
00
220571.47 in reply to 220571.46
Date: 7/7/2012 2:13:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3636
In regards to the AFC West, a large part of me thinks it could come down to which running attack can make it out healthy for a full season, taking on a full load of carries.

-McGahee/Moreno
-Mathews/Ronnie Brown(FA acquisition) (Tolbert gone)
-McFadden (Michael Bush gone)
-Jamaal Charles/Peyton Hillis(FA acquisition)

Last edited by a-o at 7/7/2012 2:15:56 PM

This Post:
00
220571.48 in reply to 220571.47
Date: 7/7/2012 8:21:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
Its looking more McGahee/Moreno/Hillman in Denver...

but yeah I agree

This Post:
00
220571.49 in reply to 220571.6
Date: 7/12/2012 9:29:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
It's all about them Steelers, I don't care what people say, I've been a Steelers fan since I started watching football, that's never gonna change! I've met Troy, Ben, Hines, and Wallace. Been to 8 games, and went to the Superbowl in Detroit! I got faith in Big Ben and the team to bring another championship!

STAIRWAY TO SEVEN BABY!

This Post:
00
220571.50 in reply to 220571.47
Date: 7/13/2012 2:23:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
A-OOOOOOOOOOO!
Broncos are going to suck, Manning isn't what he used to be, and they don't really have any weapons.
Raiders just suck, McFadden one of their few good players, #1 McFadden, #2 their Kicker and Punter lmao.

This Post:
11
220571.51 in reply to 220571.50
Date: 7/14/2012 1:18:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
A-OOOOOOOOOOO!
Broncos are going to suck, Manning isn't what he used to be, and they don't really have any weapons.
Raiders just suck, McFadden one of their few good players, #1 McFadden, #2 their Kicker and Punter lmao.


I'm just quoting it... don't feel there's anything to address, just quoting it to point out you said it.

I will say: Really? "their kicker" You don't know Janikowski as a household name?

This Post:
11
220571.52 in reply to 220571.51
Date: 7/14/2012 2:24:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
You want me to be honest? I don't give a flying !@#$ about kickers, I'd rather have a team that can score touchdowns, have a lead and NOT HAVE TO CHANCE CHIPPING ONE*Cough* Ravens

This Post:
00
220571.53 in reply to 220571.52
Date: 7/14/2012 2:29:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
That'd really suck when you lose because you don't have any extra points, and can't convert on the 2 point conversions, and your team doesn't play defense, since they just score touchdowns... Then the other team wins because they have an Akers, or Crosby, or Janikowsky that can not just hit the points, and FG but drain a long FG too.


This Post:
00
220571.54 in reply to 220571.53
Date: 7/14/2012 1:57:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2929
If you score 10,TDS they kick 10 FGS... You double their score. Nuff said

This Post:
00
220571.55 in reply to 220571.54
Date: 7/14/2012 7:41:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
Such disrespect for an entire position of players in a sport. Guess you think special teams is more to do with the guys not kicking FGs, or onside kicks, or kickoffs, or punting for field position?

Advertisement