BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Ideal Power Forward

Ideal Power Forward

Set priority
Show messages by
From: tough
This Post:
00
270992.45 in reply to 270992.44
Date: 6/22/2015 12:55:22 PM
Mountain Eagles
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
788788
Second Team:
Ric Flair Drippers
Well, I come here to share my views of my PF, or C

I have been training OD for a long time, his skillset is now 6/4/11/4/7/5-7/8/5/7

Now one of my proposed final builds was 9/7/12/12/17/12-17/18/16/12

Now that's 132 TSP there. HOF Potential.

I have a strict training regimen in mind that doesn't touch his JS until last (partly because I want to get back on top faster than going another season training outside skills) have only got views from a handful of people, and then disgruntled people criticizing how I paid 2M+ for him so I am here to see how much of a disadvantage would training JS last would be? I want to finish his outside training around late 21st year. He is 19 now, expecting final OD pop anytime soon

Would it also be safe to have more RB on him? And how much Of a scoring threat can he be with that skillset

3 Time NBBA Champion. Certified Trainer. Mentor. Have any questions? Feel free to shoot me a BB-Mail!
From: er1k

This Post:
00
270992.48 in reply to 270992.47
Date: 6/23/2015 5:41:51 AM
Berlin Street Style
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
7676
I agree with LA-Manon.
However I would rather have 17/16/14/16 inside skills. I don't rate RB that high because I feel you can compensate it with
a) good defense
b) more RB on PG/SG/SF for less salary.

This Post:
44
270992.49 in reply to 270992.1
Date: 6/23/2015 8:34:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
what an open ended question.

I would develop a PF with awesome JR and JS, good OD and amazing SB and then just play 3-2 zone all day with a Princeton offense.

Just to prove that the other offenses and defensive sets in this game work.

From: er1k

This Post:
00
270992.52 in reply to 270992.51
Date: 6/23/2015 3:21:23 PM
Berlin Street Style
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
7676
Well, I see it like this:

Why try to build great allround bigs (i.e. with decent outside skills) if you go for non-allround guards (and maybe SF)?
If you go allround on every position, you don't face salary problems with RB on your smaller players and you can play pretty much any offense you like.

Message deleted
This Post:
11
270992.55 in reply to 270992.49
Date: 6/23/2015 5:30:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
Thanks for those ideas. I've recently become aware of the importance of SB so will be training that to a fairly high level. I'll experiment with princeton too to see what the offence looks like.

Advertisement