BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Economic revenue Nation by Nation

Economic revenue Nation by Nation

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
322589.45 in reply to 322589.44
Date: 2/4/2024 2:55:07 PM
Internazionale Torreense
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
150150
Second Team:
Internazionale Sporting
Because then it truly was easy access to money and to the highest divisions, of course many teams will not be satisfied, but that always happens. There are some div's hanging around 20-30 users, where being in II. is guaranteed, and achieving promotion to I. is guaranteed as well. In that regard I agree that's not fair at all because these teams receive free promotion bonuses without even having to try. Either way a merge with these nations, and for example increasing nations of europe to 200 or 300 teams would immensely increase the enjoyment and competition of the league, and it would probably revive nations of europe and create a very competitive 1st division. It all depends on BB's will (no pun intended)

Message deleted
This Post:
00
322589.48 in reply to 322589.42
Date: 2/5/2024 9:51:34 AM
Cobra Kai
III.10
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Wu Tang Clan
Making profit and winning B3 are 2 different things. So your whole arguement is wrong from the start.

There are several examples of players that won b3 and they are from a SMALL country. Unless finland or belgium is considered a consistently top basketball country both in reality and in buzzerbeater with 500+ users in the past 5-10 years

Both of these winners had an organized plan behind them and they took full advantage of their better economics, either you see it or you dont , it is not about your opinion or mine it is about facts.

Unless I see differently, I will believe the screenshots I have seen from a big and a small country depicting their economics.

So feel free to share your economics. I have no problem doing so.