BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Playoff seeding tiebreakers

Playoff seeding tiebreakers

Set priority
Show messages by
From: j9s3
This Post:
00
166078.46 in reply to 166078.45
Date: 12/20/2010 5:34:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
Just because people use it, doesnt mean its practical or logical. And all it takes are a few lines of code to implement a better rule.
A coin toss is used when no more fair rules can be called upon. In this case, there are plenty of more fair rules...
I think the only reason they said total points scored was because someone said "wait, what if the two teams have the same record and the same points differential?" and they took a split second to think and just implemented the rule for total points.
Anyways, the chance of this situation is really small. But the amount of work to make it more fair is also really small...

From: Monkeybiz

To: j9s3
This Post:
00
166078.47 in reply to 166078.46
Date: 12/20/2010 5:40:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
At the end of the day H2H being "more fair" is only a matter of opinion. There are equally more arguments on why H2H should not be used and is just as "not fair".

The rules are set. Stick with it and this is a highly unlikely scenario in any case.

From: j9s3

This Post:
00
166078.48 in reply to 166078.47
Date: 12/20/2010 10:52:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
At the end of the day H2H being "more fair" is only a matter of opinion. There are equally more arguments on why H2H should not be used and is just as "not fair".

Alright, let's keep this simple:
Do you have any arguments why total points scored decides the better team? No.
Any arguments for H2H? Yes.
Any arguments for strength of victory? Yes.

The rules are set. Stick with it and this is a highly unlikely scenario in any case.

That's not the issue... I have no power to change the rules so I'm not trying to.

From: CrazyEye

To: j9s3
This Post:
00
166078.49 in reply to 166078.48
Date: 12/21/2010 3:59:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Any arguments for H2H? Yes.


for me head to head make less sense, it is a league system which is decided by the games against all teams. So why it should be more important how you play against team X just because you ended with the same wins? Is he better then you, just because his style of game is fit better to your team, even when he struggle with it against other teams?

And especially here when close games, end pretty curious through end game logic, which is maybe not so important over 22 games, because random functions get more close over more trys.

And in BB you also get the problem, that you don't play your best guys every time, so this comparision would be also a decided of the schedule in this week, instead of quality which should be pretty much the same-

Any arguments for strength of victory? Yes.


if a team better which could concentrate against the top teams, but play loose against bet teams? Or is an constant team better?
Maybe i understand the strength of competion, but strength of victorys no - a league system is decided by games against all teams.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 12/21/2010 4:00:52 AM

From: Monkeybiz

To: j9s3
This Post:
00
166078.50 in reply to 166078.48
Date: 12/21/2010 4:02:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Do you have any arguments why total points scored decides the better team? No.


There have been plenty of arguments made above. You just chose to ignore them.

Any arguments for H2H? Yes.

No doubt there are

Any arguments for strength of victory? Yes.


That again is just a matter of your opinion. Both arguments are equally valid. Your inability to accept the other arguments or even acknowledge them just shows plain ignorance.

Last edited by Monkeybiz at 12/21/2010 4:02:37 AM

From: j9s3

This Post:
00
166078.52 in reply to 166078.49
Date: 12/21/2010 3:16:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151



So why it should be more important how you play against team X just because you ended with the same wins? Is he better then you, just because his style of game is fit better to your team, even when he struggle with it against other teams?

You're forgetting the point. If "he struggle with it against other teams" then he probably will not be in the mix for playoffs. If he is, then the other tied team is just as equally "struggling." So, play two struggling teams against each other (remember: they are struggling almost equally - same record, same points differential) --> the better team should win. Logic: Team A plays Team B. Which team is more likely to win? The better or worse?
And I didn't say H2H is perfect, it is just better than total points.


if a team better which could concentrate against the top teams, but play loose against bet teams? Or is an constant team better?
Maybe i understand the strength of competion, but strength of victorys no - a league system is decided by games against all teams.

Strength of competition would work too. (It would basically be which conference is stronger)

From: CrazyEye

To: j9s3
This Post:
00
166078.53 in reply to 166078.52
Date: 12/21/2010 3:21:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959

You're forgetting the point. If "he struggle with it against other teams" then he probably will not be in the mix for playoffs. If he is, then the other tied team is just as equally "struggling." So, play two struggling teams against each other (remember: they are struggling almost equally - same record, same points differential) --> the better team should win. Logic: Team A plays Team B. Which team is more likely to win? The better or worse?


if team A is better then team b he would have better results in the league. You could also say the team who wins the head to head comparision, was weaker against the other teams so it is the weaker team.

From: j9s3

This Post:
11
166078.54 in reply to 166078.50
Date: 12/21/2010 3:27:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
Do you have any arguments why total points scored decides the better team? No.


There have been plenty of arguments made above. You just chose to ignore them.

Really? Name one reason how a team that scores more points per game is better than a team that scores less points per game.



Any arguments for strength of victory? Yes.


That again is just a matter of your opinion. Both arguments are equally valid. Your inability to accept the other arguments or even acknowledge them just shows plain ignorance.

This is not an opinion. It is not arguable. It is a fact. You don't have to completely agree with an argument for it to be logical, as long as there is reason behind it. That being said, the argument itself is arguable/debatable, but the existence of an argument is not arguable.
There are several arguments for strength of victory: I will name one - Team A and Team B are tied in records and point differentials. Team A has beaten better teams that Team B. Therefore, Team A is probably stronger (and has a better chance of beating the same strong teams again in the playoffs.)
Again, you may not agree with this argument, but you cannot deny that there is some logic in it, and that it should theoretically work for over 50% of the time.
(In case you're not sure what strength of victory is: "If two teams end with identical records, combine the records of the opponents in each of the team's wins and calculate the total winning percentage. The team whose opponents have the higher winning percentage wins the tiebreaker.")

From: Manouche

To: j9s3
This Post:
00
166078.55 in reply to 166078.54
Date: 12/21/2010 4:31:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
699699
How is Team A probably stronger since Team A has lost to worst teams that Team B ? Isn't it an indication it is probably weaker ? :D

You are trying hard here, hats off to you !
There is no point in trying to find who is the better team from two who are tied in wins and point differential over 22 games ! Points scored is simple and effective. It doesn't mean that the team who scored more points is better, both teams are of equal force to the point they are causing an upset in the forum and should both be demoted to set an example.

From: Monkeybiz

To: j9s3
This Post:
00
166078.56 in reply to 166078.54
Date: 12/21/2010 5:33:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Really? Name one reason how a team that scores more points per game is better than a team that scores less points per game.


Most sporting competition favors the more offensive team. Everything else being equal, a team that is able to score more is ranked higher than the one that scores less because to win, you have to be able to score.

Your logic for H2H does not work here and is even more unfair. It works in the NBA because all teams play their best lineup all games. In BB, there are some teams you only play once and it is luck of the draw whether this game will be at home or away. At other times, you are deliberately resting starters for game shape reasons so at all times your best players might not even be in the game. E.g if you are going on a cup run, some teams will tank a league game in order to be able to field a full strength lineup for the cup. Does this mean their team is weak? not necessarily. It just means they didn't field their strongest lineup in a league game.

Again, you may not agree with this argument, but you cannot deny that there is some logic in it, and that it should theoretically work for over 50% of the time.


I never denied your argument and I never claimed it was illogical. Like I said, H2H has its place but in an environment like BB, it is not the best or most logical approach.

Advertisement