Erm, I am a bit confused as to where this discussion is leading. It's leading where the vast majority of BB threads lead: nowhere or oblivion.
Erm, I am a bit confused as to where this discussion is leading.
This policy is intended to keep the market economy fair for everyone, and we hope you sympathize with our concerns.
How it is possible to evaluate that some team has bid too much money on the player....maybe this player is very good, and that is not my fault that someone is so stupid to bid too much money on the player...I hope that everyone understood what I wanted to say....
This policy is intended to keep the market economy fair for everyone, and we hope you sympathize with our concerns. i have to raise a question because this rule does not cover a specific situation. i understand that from a bidwar worth 100k or 200k over the value of the player is in the benefit of the current owner and from the competition of 2 potential big buyers the owner might get a bigger price than intended and thus leading to market unfair. What about free agency? seeing that bot teams lose their players to free agency, practicaly the money spent on buying the player from free agency disappears.for example, you have a sensational rebounder which is pretty hard to evaluate, because there are to few such player on the market because their high skill is from persistant bot training. but because the money i overbid goes to nobody and the fact that nobody else bids over me might mean 2 thing.....1 i evaluated wrong and i overpaid without the risk of unfairness and not favoring anybody, or 2 by paing more on my mistake i don't affect the economy rather than taking money out of the game.bottom line, shouldn't free agent players be bought on whatever amount of money the buyer wants? (mainly because it affects no one)