BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy

Economy (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152075.464 in reply to 152075.461
Date: 8/20/2010 2:22:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Maybe stop playing the game if it's too hard for you? Reddaddy said everything perfectly about this situation but you're still whining. It seems that you have only your opinion and don't think about other possible ways. Can't you understand that if your TV contract and merchandise becomes larger other teams in your division get the same thing so the competativity comes to be the same

From: Rosen
This Post:
00
152075.465 in reply to 152075.464
Date: 8/20/2010 3:00:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7373
Here´s what I don´t get about these Spanish and Italian Div II and III.

These divisions are so supercompetitive that ALL teams need to have salaries they can´t afford. Then right before the play offs when they ALL want to buy that last player who will get them ALL promoted, they are outbid by smaller countries managers. So when ALL BUT ONE team fails to promote, and 4 teams relegate, there´s still 11 teams who stays in their division. Now, apparently, these 11 teams, along with the team relegated from the division above, all need to rebuild or they go bankrupt!?!

So now there´s 4 promoted teams with salaries they can afford for 1 season only (because they have planned for several seasons to make their push this very season) and there´s 12 teams that in no way possible can keep their rosters and compete, but still, theres only 4 teams relegating that year too.

I really don´t get it.

This Post:
00
152075.466 in reply to 152075.461
Date: 8/20/2010 4:17:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
181181
Excellent speech Steve!
Sin is useless cause they don't want to understand or..... they are not able to understand!

This Post:
00
152075.467 in reply to 152075.421
Date: 8/20/2010 5:07:37 PM
MightyMice
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
495495
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs
my question to all the spanish and italian managers complaining in here is simple why should small countries have a lower net salary cap then bigger countries ? , why should we be disadvantaged compared to say italy and spain ? , why should we not be allowed to build up our div's to the same standards as italy or spain?


to reach a II division in Italy I have to spend millions in players, cannot easily expand my seats, so have a reduced cash flow if compared to yours. So when I will reach a II division I will not have plenty of cash or tens of thousand seats that ensures me solid cash flow.

What I wish is to have the same chances of yours to decided whether and where spending my money: if we would be in II division both, we should decide on the same basis among a level 7 trainer, a killer center, a larger amount of seats, etc. At this moment, we cannot.

And let me add that I always based my team politics - as I do with success elsewhere - on a healthy economy, with solid training (and related cash), smart purchase, long term investments, planning one-two seasons in advance!

This Post:
00
152075.468 in reply to 152075.432
Date: 8/20/2010 5:08:44 PM
MightyMice
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
495495
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs
I think that the main problem here is that a spanish or italian team is asked to have a perfect economical structure. And this is not asked to the other teams countries.

This Post:
00
152075.469 in reply to 152075.439
Date: 8/20/2010 5:17:46 PM
MightyMice
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
495495
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs
let me suggest something, that is fun, not too difficult to be implemented, can thrill all players, stimulating more interest in the game.

Now, there is just one international tournament, BBB, reserved to a minimal amount of managers.

Let's introduce International competition per series.

It would be an arcade competition, using the same formula of Consolation Tournament for NT/U21 (nothing to be invented).

There are 5 cups. Each is reserved to teams belonging to one defined series (cup for I series, excluding participants to BBB; II series; etc...). Having the same formula of consolation, you can include a quite large number of teams, as the number of matches is limited. If there are (let's say) 4 teams per nation (but number can be larger, I haven't done calculations), the four will be the ones with better international ranking per each nation.

The tournament would increase the international breadth of the game, and add a piece of interest.

As side effect, it would stimulate cross-country comparison. My expectation would be:
- in first edition(s), teams from more competitive countries would easily win
- as side effect, teams from less competitive countries should spend money to enforce their roster and face stiff competition
- that would produce an avalanche effect where teams of same divisions of formerly less competitive countries should spend money to become competitive, even not participating to international cups

in (some...) seasons that should force some rebalancing.

the number of seasons is probably directly proportional to number of teams admitted per series. that should be carefully defined.

This Post:
00
152075.470 in reply to 152075.461
Date: 8/20/2010 5:23:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
And a further effect,is that,because of your greater power on the market,I am denied or strongly hindered in using some strategies,as for example like blow up my team,because you still have an higher power on the market than me(user of a large country)
The best manager is the one who chooses the best tactic for his team at his teams current position. Your facts are all false, why? because every team in every league in Italy can not be in red season after season. Please try to understand that when teams reach their salary cap the game changes. It seems to me people complaining about the cap can just not cope with the change. It eventually comes down to who can micromanage his teams different areas the best. Perhaps that's the time when you need to fire your coach and start training stamina/FT's. Try to sell your players with imbalanced skills and trade them for a balanced one. Perhaps even sell 2 players to get that one balanced low salary player, creating some more weekly income that you can later on use on a sub. Thus getting more skills out of a dollar.
Why the hell are you complaning about not able to use a tactic any more. Can a starting team start with a tactic of buying 100k salary players right away? He could but it would take a lot of time before he could buy one. Thus making it a less effective tactic. Just like you can't expect to win with a 10 PG team. How long will it actually take for you to understand that when you hit that salary cap, you can't expect to be buying players constantly any more. Your team is already at it's full strenght for that level. If you can't promote with that team, you need to look for a flaw in the buildup, not try to fix it with giving every team in your country some extra income. Big country users can not actually use the sell all, gather money, relegate, buy team and promote up again be stronger, why? because you are paying a big tax on the rebuy and are not sure to promote because of the great competition. So this come down to again choosing the best possible tactic for your team.
It has been made black and white for you, colored red, put naked girls on it and you still don't get it.

This Post:
00
152075.471 in reply to 152075.470
Date: 8/20/2010 5:40:43 PM
MightyMice
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
495495
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs
And a further effect,is that,because of your greater power on the market,I am denied or strongly hindered in using some strategies,as for example like blow up my team,because you still have an higher power on the market than me(user of a large country)
The best manager is the one who chooses the best tactic for his team at his teams current position. Your facts are all false, why? because every team in every league in Italy can not be in red season after season. Please try to understand that when teams reach their salary cap the game changes. It seems to me people complaining about the cap can just not cope with the change. It eventually comes down to who can micromanage his teams different areas the best. Perhaps that's the time when you need to fire your coach and start training stamina/FT's. Try to sell your players with imbalanced skills and trade them for a balanced one. Perhaps even sell 2 players to get that one balanced low salary player, creating some more weekly income that you can later on use on a sub. Thus getting more skills out of a dollar.
Why the hell are you complaning about not able to use a tactic any more. Can a starting team start with a tactic of buying 100k salary players right away? He could but it would take a lot of time before he could buy one. Thus making it a less effective tactic. Just like you can't expect to win with a 10 PG team. How long will it actually take for you to understand that when you hit that salary cap, you can't expect to be buying players constantly any more. Your team is already at it's full strenght for that level. If you can't promote with that team, you need to look for a flaw in the buildup, not try to fix it with giving every team in your country some extra income. Big country users can not actually use the sell all, gather money, relegate, buy team and promote up again be stronger, why? because you are paying a big tax on the rebuy and are not sure to promote because of the great competition. So this come down to again choosing the best possible tactic for your team.
It has been made black and white for you, colored red, put naked girls on it and you still don't get it.


I don't agree at all.

I am proud of the sharp balancing of my economy, team, skills. I always picked players with specific combinations of skills to have the best out of them. I built and sold key players to sustain growth. For the first time ever I have some red in my balance, but planned as next season I will be able to fix it selling one star of my team. As me, there are many other players taking any single drop out of their team's resources.

Said so, I am a little upset when a III series user can easily spend millions to buy players just because his opponents could not face my rotation team. This does not happen in Italy (may be in some V series, but immediately rebalanced in IV).

If you want, I can send you all my roster to see what is wrong. By the way, all my bi-season training programs are carefully planned to minimize salary after season one.

Last edited by GM-BlackMouse at 8/20/2010 5:41:55 PM

This Post:
00
152075.472 in reply to 152075.471
Date: 8/20/2010 5:55:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
So what's the problem? You are leader in your division :)

This Post:
00
152075.473 in reply to 152075.472
Date: 8/20/2010 6:49:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
181181
So what's the problem?


He wrote it, just read:
"Said so, I am a little upset when a III series user can easily spend millions to buy players just because his opponents could not face my rotation team. This does not happen in Italy"

Advertisement