this sounds like you are the silly one, I said could since he has so many options. I did say he "could" take a paycut... dont flame me just because I am giving my 2 cent, your the one making it sounds like the sure thing that he definately wont, he definately will... again all I said that knicks was no sure thing.
no offense I dont even get some of the counter point since they are just some form of insults or something??
He had options, but he wasn't willing to take any. He wanted to be traded before the cutoff because the CBA will cut his potential earnings by a bucketload. The only team he was willing to sign an extension with were the Knicks. It would be better if they had waited, cause if he really wanted to go to them he would, but the $65m was way too important.
That's just over $21m a season, something he can't get if the league changes to salary structure.
ermmm what? that was my own point that felton was an average guard made good by the system... what does that have to do with other peoples' posts.
That's exactly what I said. So we agree on that. But he's 8 years younger than Billups. So there was no need for this swap.
in what universe is steve nash fast and agile? also that doesnt even qualify as an argument? I also remember your the one that said billups dont fit the offense so that probably meant he is a step down from felton? I didnt even say fisher run pick and roll? what? all I said was that the slower guards that still thrive on the pick and roll? beside was steve nash really fast... when he was pick and roll with amare just last season with great success i might add...
Nash has always been pretty crafty. He's no John Wall or Rose in terms of speed, but he can move pretty well. Nash thrives off pick and roll and run and gun, he would be great for the Knicks. Not so much Billups.
no. who the hell would take a shooter over a scorer? he shoots 38% carrer simply due 1 great season when he shot 45% in his first season... also carrer shooting % doesnt mean much when your a 3rd year rookie... so dont make him sounds like a second coming of reggie miller...
The issue isn't Gallinari vs Melo. It's "Why bow down to Denver and trade Gallinari as well as everything else"
The initial offer didn't include Gallinari. They gutted so much of their team. If they had kept Gallinari it would have been an awesome trade.
But it isn't. I didn't intend to make it personal, so if you're offended for some strange reason, harden up.
=)