BuzzerBeater Forums

Non-BB Global (English) > NBA Playoffs 2011

NBA Playoffs 2011

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
180258.47 in reply to 180258.45
Date: 5/8/2011 7:19:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
once again they are blown up in a live-or-die game.

Rather inane thing to say.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
180258.49 in reply to 180258.39
Date: 5/8/2011 8:45:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
104104
Now do you want to jump on the Mav band wagon with me?

This Post:
00
180258.50 in reply to 180258.49
Date: 5/8/2011 10:26:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137

So is this the way Phil Jackson goes out?

This Post:
00
180258.51 in reply to 180258.49
Date: 5/9/2011 12:08:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Now do you want to jump on the Mav band wagon with me?

Hell no.
Sorry man, but I've disliked Dallas for a while. Cannot stand Jason Terry.
I'll be cheering for the Thunder here on out... and if they lose: Memphis.


http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
180258.52 in reply to 180258.45
Date: 5/9/2011 12:12:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
i suppose inane means there was no reason. i am not sure about my english.

if you mean this, i just said it because it's not just a loss. it's their whole season that was on the court and their effort was very little. i found it very normal to get eliminated by much more hungrier teams. but it was really ugly as an effort in general. i am a laker fan too, i didn't enjoy it at all

but after all we are talking about a three peat. not something very easy and common to do .

Sorry 'bout that: I keep forgetting this is a truly international discussion. And it was perhaps the wrong word to use...
But my meaning would be that saying "once again they are blown up in a live-or-die game" is wrong. LA have won the past two seasons, and been in the past three Finals... that statement's simply incorrect.

I hated that game. More for the way they lost than the loss itself, or even... more the way they DEALT with the loss. It was ugly - and not the score, the petulance. Bynum's foul was simply awful.
We all hate it when our team loses, but I'd be lying if I said there wasn't a tiny bit of shame for LA today.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
From: Tesse
This Post:
00
180258.53 in reply to 180258.52
Date: 5/9/2011 4:21:43 AM
Cruesli
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
530530
Second Team:
The Milk
The foul was really ugly and I hope he gets a severe ban for multiple games next season.

I'm cheering for OKC as well, but hope they can pick their game up again. Last match looked great until suddenly Westbrook and Durant started missing all their shots. Not a field goal in 8 minutes or something. Was terrible to watch.

If not OKC, I would hope for Dirk winning a ring.

Crunchy! If you eat fast enough
This Post:
00
180258.55 in reply to 180258.54
Date: 5/9/2011 8:41:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532

after that loss from boston, you knew that the lakers team would bounce back and dominate. not just revenge but domination. the past 2 years they did that, and took their revenge from boston too. after yesterday's loss, i feel there will be a significant change to the team. phil is 99% out, and the frontline probably will not be the same. if a legend like magic says "blow up the team" it sounds serious.

i enjoyed the run this team had but i feel the time came for a change. i still believe that with the right moves next year we can still be strong contenders. kobe's legacy isn't over yet. he has 2-3 years of top basketball to play. if he is surrounded with a bit more youth , maybe he can grab the 6th ring.

for this season, i strongly support the mavs. dirk & kidd are worthy for a ring. let the younger stars fight with each other the next years. i go with the "old guard".

Hmmm... given that they weren't necessarily the strongest team in the regular season, "dominate" might be a lil' overdone.
I agree that there might be significant changes. The points cannot get it done - LA's incredibly weak there. And Phil going out will probably mean scrapping the triangle and going to a more up-tempo offense - something Jerry West prefers.
Prior to the last game, I thought that maybe Gasol had put himself on the block... but I now think they'll keep him. It would not surprise me if Andrew Bynum's played his last game as a Laker. It'd sadden me tho'.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
180258.57 in reply to 180258.56
Date: 5/9/2011 12:45:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I guess the real question is what happened to Gasol? He went from 18 ppg/53% FGP to 13 ppg/42% FGP. His rebounding dropped a bit too...

I agree that Fisher is getting up there in age, but he played pretty well iin the playoffs (actually picked it up in the playoffs). Steve Blake started the season strong, but was pretty sad by playoff time. Not sure what the Lakers can do at PG...maybe more minutes for Shannon Brown?



Advertisement