C'mon, you've got to be kidding me man.
Are you saying that Costantinopolis deserved their loss for choosing a wrong tactic?
And what do you say about Boston Celtics so?
He decided to defend 2-3, completely wrong, against a Motion (or R&G).
I'm not kidding at all, I'm just getting a little tired about a not-so-very-special game, although some others might think different.
Boston choose a wrong defensive tactic indeed but a nice offensive one, but Constant choose a mediocre defense tactic and a wrong offensive tactic. I think we can expect top class top division teams know that slow paced tactics are generally worse than fast paced offenses, especially since the BB just announced that and since the topic starter said these words:
This thread is funny, I can understand the level of other leagues in the world.....
So why would one chose the slow pace offense again then?
And it almost seems like 'pericle's fans' (pls dont take that too serious) don't even look at offensive flow. Everyone is just looking at offense vs defense, why is that? The importance of the OF is underestimated.
You can have a legendary offense vs an atrocious defense, but if you have nobody who can bring the ball to the other basket by passing or handling the ball well, you won't optimally use your legendary offense.
Ok 13 points might be a little too much for a 50-50 game but hey it isn't that special as it seems.
Last edited by BB-Patrick at 11/11/2008 7:59:21 AM