BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 2-3 zone

2-3 zone

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
235487.48 in reply to 235487.17
Date: 2/23/2013 5:25:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
id love to play scrimage with u while u defending my LI with 3-2 zone:D

In my opinions 3-2 is only good if oponent has like awfull or inept offensiver flow, as this happens on lower levels. if he has high driving and passing everywhere ur team just gets destroyed with like 75 percenty shooting for bigs and like 80 percent assited shots:D i have like 73 percent shooting for my bigs over this season with not so spectacular inside shots (look at the game ratings) only because i have 3 players with 15 passing on my starting lineup sometimes, mostly 2 cause of training:D

when playing against 2-3 zones, i actually fear them. looking diown and praying that guy playing 2-3 zone wont come to the final. cause my 75 p[ercent shooting becomes like 45 for bigs against 2-3 zones, and my guards forced to take mid range jumpers with like 6jr lol.....

Last edited by Gajus Julijus Cezaris at 2/23/2013 5:29:19 AM

This Post:
00
235487.49 in reply to 235487.48
Date: 2/23/2013 7:15:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
367367
As I have said before, its a situational tactic. Just like everything else in this game, it takes judgement to decide. You would not be one of the teams I would play this tactic against, because you have very high flow for your level of play. But if you can out-pressure your opponent's flow, 3-2 vs. LI can be effective. It doesnt have to necessarily be 3, or 4. Just low enough to where your OD has the advantage.

As far as the 2-3 zones, I wouldnt fear them as much as you do with your team. Your contested IS percentage may go down, but your JS% and 3pt% will go up dramatically, and you will pretty much have your way with moving the ball, resulting in uncontested IS. An uncontested shot is an uncontested shot, regardless of your opponent's ID, and to contest shots, you have to have OD.


Last edited by yeppers at 2/23/2013 7:17:03 AM