BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis

Training Speed Analysis (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: nickfox45

This Post:
00
381.48 in reply to 381.47
Date: 9/28/2007 10:13:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Anyone else care to confirm this? I wonder if the BBs slowed down training on purpose?

From: brian

This Post:
00
381.50 in reply to 381.49
Date: 9/28/2007 11:55:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Here's the status of the 5 trainees:

2 @ proficient for 5 weeks
2 @ average, one for 4 weeks / one for 6 weeks (some of those weeks with less then 48 mins though)
1 @ proficient, just popped from strong after 4 weeks

Now that I look a tracking I was doing for inside training, it's possible that the last rounds of pops included training from the first season (i was doing rebounding most this season), and I didn't track the first season very well. Plus I know they had to adjust training at one point in the first season when players were popping almost every week.

For reboudning, I'm 99% sure about the 3-4 week per pop w/ 5 trainees, 48+ mins played, and 10-trainer.

Edited 9/29/2007 12:00:18 AM by brianjames

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
381.51 in reply to 381.49
Date: 9/29/2007 6:39:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
training penalty if skill sets are too out of balance


Correct.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
381.52 in reply to 381.51
Date: 9/29/2007 12:03:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
what does "skill sets" and "out of balance" mean?

if he is a C the skill sets would be inside scoring|+ rebound+ inside def+ block shot?

and out of balance: big difference between these skills or training in a skill that the player is not suited for? (ex: rebounding for a 1m80 player)

From: LA-Niko

This Post:
11
381.53 in reply to 381.52
Date: 9/29/2007 2:19:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
sets of complementary skills make training go faster

if you have an 18 yo with high level of skills in a certain area (ie. inside skills like you mentioned) then training in those skills is faster than if you tried to train outside skills.

Things like handling and driving are probably more general complementary skills for inside and outside which improve players lack of Turn Overs and improve ability to attempt shots.

The two main groups are:
Outside Skills:
Jump Shot + Jump Range + Outside Defence + Passing

Inside Skills:
Inside Shot + Inside Defence + Rebounding + Shot Blocking

Training does take into account height as well. Short players are better at training in outside skills and tall players in inside skills.

Big differences in skills are probably not a factor but if a player has very low skill level in more than two of the skills in the desired area for the player to be training in then it would be considered a very bad player to play in that area.

Edited 9/29/2007 2:25:19 PM by JudgeNik

Creator of (http://www.buzzerbeaterstats.com) and (http://www.buzzerbeaternews.com/) -- Ex GM of Australia -- Division 1 winner of Italy Season 1 then moved team to Australia after the country was created by the BBs. Australian team manager for 2 seasons. Won various tournaments and division 1 titles in the following seasons.
From: johny13

This Post:
00
381.55 in reply to 381.53
Date: 9/29/2007 3:24:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
ok thanks, very clear!

This Post:
00
381.56 in reply to 381.52
Date: 9/29/2007 5:17:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
if he is a C the skill sets would be inside scoring|+ rebound+ inside def+ block shot?


Correct.

and out of balance: big difference between these skills or training in a skill that the player is not suited for? (ex: rebounding for a 1m80 player)


Not really.

Let's say you have a player really good in one of his relevant skills, but the other three are lagging.

That highly-trained skill will train more slowly than it would otherwise, and everything else lags until you achieve a better balance.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
381.57 in reply to 381.54
Date: 9/29/2007 6:15:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
then i'm just underestimating inside scoring, which I figured was possible.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
381.58 in reply to 381.56
Date: 9/29/2007 8:07:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
Wow. That's great information. Is there some reason that it isn't in the rules?

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
Advertisement