BuzzerBeater Forums

there is an Australian team experimenting with training big man skills on shorter players
might give you an idea of what Ur looking at for training

i cant find the thread, but i have a link to a Google spreadsheet and have been watching the progress he is making
https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AgiIAK1Xty1ydEdha...

Last edited by kaukasion at 2/27/2011 12:13:57 PM

Likewise they are unable to play a 2-3 or 1-3-1 zone effectively because their guard SF doesn't have the ID and RB which those defenses require from the SF position.

Is that true about the 1-3-1 zone? I would have thought a SF would need less ID in that tactic because he is stationed further away from the basket.

there is an Australian team experimenting with training big man skills on shorter players
might give you an idea of what Ur looking at for training

i cant find the thread, but i have a link to a Google spreadsheet and have been watching the progress he is making
https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AgiIAK1Xty1ydEdha...

Thanks for this link. I'll look at it closely and see.

since this is about SFs....there is a SF in the upcoming draft who has "A" potential....but is 7 foot tall....i was wondering is that going to hurt him as a SF and if i draft him would it be better to use him as a SF or PF/C maybe?

You'd hope he's an over-sized SG with good inside skills, so you can train him as a PF.

It would be too difficult to train a 7 footer as a SF especially his OD which is one of the most important SF skills. Like iwen said though he may make a great PF trainee.

Great post there. I find myself in a pretty similar situation. Didnt see a way to win my league so I decided to start over. Sold everybody and took a couple of young SF prospects one of which is local that I am gonna be keeping and the other will be sold. Had outbid a china farm team as well for my rookie. The only difference is that I am tanking the season which is a risky risky business but the money is so so good. Not sure if I'd go further down to d3 next season but I guess thats for another topic.

As SF training goes-its really a real pain. The way I see it he will finally settle on the SF position at the age of 24 or something close and still he wont be "the perfect SF" but still a very solid one. Using a lvl6 trainer just like you so I would be curious about how far ahead is your player at the age of 20. If you're willing to share you can send me a mail as I got loads of questions about developing SFs and the team in general.

I´m training a SF in the third season now, he was my own draft. I can´t understand, why most of you are frustrated about the training. I started with one round of everything, so i could see how the sublevel was (a very successfully enterprise). Next, i trained him in the Pointguard-Skills (passing, od, driving). After season one, he could start at the 2 without high disadvantages (first half of the season in the cup), and because of his inside-skills, he was a very good option to play Look-Inside and meanwhile train him in range.

In the offseason he had to play inside, to push him a few stages in the inside-skills, focused in inside-shot. Now, in season three, he already can play almost everywhere, i just have to put his defense to 2 or 3, offense is no problem. I think i´m playing a very successfully season, and my 20 yo trainee is no obstacle, but rather U21-player.

There is only one point SF-training sucks: If u have a very good SF, trained this SF for years, u get no reasonable price for this player. At the moment, my league opponent tries to sell his national-player Uyigarli, this player has a price evaluation about 1,25 Mio., which is really ridiculous.

(Pls apologize my bad english, school is some years ago ;) )