Btw it was the second time he was on market, 6 days are not half a season. The other 3 days were a month before with 1 pop less in OD.
This is not true. I had him in my bookmark for weeks...but I will not argue with you because it's not a point.
The point is that we both, very experienced users have different point of view on value of the same player. Ok, you are seller, I'm buyer so perspective is different...but still. The same have to concern GM's who evaluate transfers...because ALWAYS player is value as much as somebody want to pay for him, beyond situation when somebody cheat or just transfer money. This evaluation of player value is changing through the time of a season are depending on TSP, hight of potential, age, salary, skills distribution. Somebody value TSP more than salary, somebody opposite. I mean this evaluation can't be free of mistakes and this is place for jealousy, prejudice and abuse, which shouldn't have place. That's why we should have clear rules describing value of player or simply cut off only that transfers which are visibly cheating cases.
We'r talking about people who buys for 100k and sells for 1m or more useless players for scamming noobs..
Come on...this is the obvious case and such transfers should be adjusted immediately...and what's more cutted money should be restored on buyer account (It would happy newbies more than Joe's idea). I think it doesn't require to be discussed here at all. Do you want to say that this is a real problem of BB? It would means that something with GM's work is not ok.