BuzzerBeater Forums

Changes should be considered. We can agree on that. However, the BBs won't and shouldn't remove a piece of the game that users have genuine control over for competition.

Changes should be considered. We can agree on that. However, the BBs won't and shouldn't remove a piece of the game that users have genuine control over for competition.

Private Leagues? All I'm saying is that if some people want to use them that way, they can ... just like now. They can use them any way they please. I'm not saying the bosses would restrict that. The possible change i would contemplate would be allowing even non-supporters to use PL's, perhaps for a fee less than full supporter or perhaps for no fee at all. All open to consideration.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 4/17/2016 7:57:49 PM

Please stop posting. None of your posts make sense.

Last edited by Oreo Dunker at 4/17/2016 8:36:56 PM

First of all, Manon, thank you for taking the time to consider these things and respond constructively. That's really what I've been looking for from someone all along.

1. True, it may not be strictly needed, but surely you have seen the intensity of the feelings about this expressed on the forums, and we don't need to strip anyone of their flag or their national identity.
2. I agree with you, but again, we don't need to deprive anyone of the chance to play in BBB.
3. I agree, we don't need to delete forums, and people will use them, or not, as they wish.
4. Not redo, agreed. It will take a thorough job now to prevent that. Crushing unfriendly nations together unnecessarily wouldn't be consistent with that goal.
5. Check.
6. Check.
7. Check.
8. Well, I agree with you. I'm just saying the opportunity would be there now or if needed in the future.
9. Some people really put a lot into PL.s, and retaining them is a plus.

Thanks again for your contribution. We agree almost 100% after all it seems.

I am sorry that you are unable to follow along. Perhaps the exchange with Manon above will help you.

Regarding PLs he didn't say they would be removed. He just said they don't have anything to do with the micro issues or merging.

2. Okay, I'll bow to your experience with B3. I just have never been particularly interested in it.

We will see a higher competition on the NT scene to if we don't have tiny nations.

I can't argue that, I don't know it well enough.

9. If the reshuffle scatters teams from a particular nation into a lot of worlds, people may still like to have a competition for teams of just their nation, and that could still be done via PL's.

1: Yes the flag doesn't need to be taken. However I'm not very much for a solution where NT's still are in the game for small nations. We will see a higher competition on the NT scene to if we don't have tiny nations.

If the small NTs are removed, this would probably be a very very bad move. Instead there should be like multiple levels of NT competition, like a Group A, where the top ranked teams play, a group B for the mediocre nations and a group C for the hopeless.

Give the utopia players real nationalities, preferrably overweight by micronations, so every country has a decent amount of players to pick from and we won't need to talk about removing NTs. I would love to see my player Bo Taylor play for a micronation, give the Utopians some purpose.