BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Game Shape

Game Shape

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
105943.5 in reply to 105943.4
Date: 8/23/2009 3:12:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i can not explain it better then the linked picture, depending on the minutes you play and a random factor your game shape stays/increase/raise, 55-60 minutes seems to be the best for the game shape of the player.

This Post:
00
105943.6 in reply to 105943.5
Date: 8/23/2009 3:25:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
But when I played my player 80 min last week. Will I know have to aim somewhere about 40 min or still 55-60?

This Post:
00
105943.7 in reply to 105943.6
Date: 8/23/2009 3:42:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
just the minutes from the actual week -> 55-60

This Post:
00
105943.8 in reply to 105943.6
Date: 8/23/2009 3:44:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
55-60 should still be best. As I understand it, the impact of the previous week has to do with your player's current game shape (which clearly affects what game shape you end up with after an increase or a decrease).

From: inimene
This Post:
00
105943.9 in reply to 105943.8
Date: 8/23/2009 3:55:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Thank You!

This Post:
00
105943.10 in reply to 105943.9
Date: 8/23/2009 6:01:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
If the system is a bit like in Hattrick, then we've got 2 factors influencing game shape.

1) "The background shape" which could be affected by the long term, thus a few weeks ago untill now, since the rules state the gameshape is truly calculation over a few weeks of time.

2) "The standard game shape" which only seems to be affected by the current week.

Those two make the new gameshape.

Just as in HT where your real gameshape might change depending on a change in the background shape (up or down).

Maybe the comparison with HT isn't that good in this case, but that might clarify some of the randomness in game shape calculations.

This Post:
00
105943.11 in reply to 105943.10
Date: 8/23/2009 6:24:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i would say no, depending on my experience and the sheet for the first gs update in the season ;)

I have some player who have good minutes around several weeks, who didn't raise for some weeks people who had bad minutes and instantly get back in shape in the next week. I even get the opposite both i don't see a coincidence for the importance of the last last weeks, because people with "bad" minutes behave like players who stays with good minutes at bad shape in the coming weeks.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 8/23/2009 6:24:56 PM

This Post:
00
105943.12 in reply to 105943.11
Date: 8/23/2009 6:32:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Since the game shape is reset at offseason there is no way to conclude anything about the influence of past weeks from that research, since the past weeks can't be included in there due to the reset.

Also there is no need at all to question the rules time by time, which seems to be one of your favorites (forgive me if I'm wrong). The rules are right, unless proven wrong.

This Post:
00
105943.13 in reply to 105943.12
Date: 8/24/2009 1:03:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Also there is no need at all to question the rules time by time, which seems to be one of your favorites (forgive me if I'm wrong). The rules are right, unless proven wrong.


in my eyes the past effect of the last week is the current game shape ;)

Or did you get a player with GS 3 in one week to GS 9 with optimum minutes, i say no like you don't get a player within one week to GS 3. So my modell clearly fit with the rules.

Since the game shape is reset at offseason there is no way to conclude anything about the influence of past weeks from that research, since the past weeks can't be included in there due to the reset.


the different progress of same minutes, seems to me a clear factor for randomness especially because there aren't no past weeks - thats why i choose that ;)Later on the gs seems to be behaven foor me like at the beginning.

Even i don't expect a bad background form for player who have from beginning on good minutes.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
105943.14 in reply to 105943.13
Date: 8/26/2009 6:41:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
It's a combination of two weeks minutes. Perhaps it's not the best to play 0 and 120. But it looks the same to play 40-80 compared to 60-60.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
105943.15 in reply to 105943.14
Date: 8/26/2009 7:57:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
not with my team^^

Advertisement