Maybe some users are unhappy with the "slow" development of the game because some of the new features you named, were not requested or on top of the users wishlist.
I dont value the rankings and the defensive matchups a lot, the new forums are as good/bad as the old ones, and the old design was good enough for me. So to me, even knowing all the changes, it seems that there were no major innovations.
Supporter features seem to be nice but to be honest in my opinion the supporter package is overpriced (I already had a 3month subscription, just to dodge some flames...).
That`s why BBs could choose 3 features suggested on Suggestions or other forums and handle the voting, which one of them BB community wants to see most. They could give estimated time near each of possible feature... For example:
1) hall of fame (estimated time to develop 3 months)
2) players history page (estimated time to develop 2 months)
3) teams history page (estimated time to develop 4 months)
4) user history page (estimated time to develop 1 months)
The point is that estimated time suppose to be written using some formula like this:
BB think they`ll do it in 1month so estimated time would be 2months
BB think they`ll do it in 2month so estimated time would be 3months
BB think they`ll do it in 3month so estimated time would be 4months
BB think they`ll do it in >4month so estimated time would be +30%
So in such a case we could choose what we want and in what direction the game should develop... As well as we would know on what BBs are working and that we chosen the feature which takes ~5 moths of BBs time programing it, so we do not have right to ask for something else from them as they are doing what we have asked them to do.
ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=