Fair enough, but what about this scenario: Two teams are neck and neck for the final playoff spot. One of them is playing a top team in his final game of the season, needing a win or a loss by the other guy. The other team is also playing a top team, but the owner of that top team decides to reset and puts out a weak, newly generated team.
Seriously, who would ever do such a stupid thing? Who would ever like to reset his contending team to start over?
This suggestion is pointed towards newbies who made horrible mistakes that set them back for ages, and the only possibility to stay and enjoy the game is to start over as soon as possible. If I had to wait for two months I would move on and find another manager game...
So all managers of top-contending teams stay interested all the time? How about someone who's leaving the game anyway? How about someone who's abusing the system to help someone else out? I'd like for the world to be as innocent as you seem to think it is, where just because something appears to be stupid, people find no motivation to do it. But alas, things are not as peachy.
We'll have to agree to disagree, but if a new player doesn't take the time to read about the game and makes mistakes, a simple 'reset' option isn't going to make him stay. If he wasn't that excited about the game to begin with and read all he could about the game, he'll probably still get bored and leave even after a reset. I don't see the reset option as being a successful tool in keeping people interested. But I can certainly see the many ways it can be abused.
Edit to add: Let's not kid ourselves either. If you're new and you make bonehead mistakes, you're not going to set yourself back for "ages". It's not like you had a very competitive team to begin with.
Last edited by ShootingStars at 10/23/2010 2:34:02 PM