195 online at 00:56:52

BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Single player training

Single player training

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
162827.5 in reply to 162827.4
Date: 10/31/2010 3:15:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
No offense taken. I understand if you couldn't have cited a reference due to this being a federation or private discussion. It has been said that out of every one hundred ideas generated in the minds of men, only one will ultimately be expressed as a suggestion. So lets consider for a moment that these rare suggestions are even more rarely given serious consideration, and that a smaller number of those are regarded as noteworthy and feasible. Given your account of how resulting suggestions are treated, the common suggestion box humor seems applicable. I might have been experiencing a rare moment of optimism, but I just hated to pass up what I believed to be an original and noteworthy suggestion. I agree, there is little value in discussing ideas that have already been summarily dismissed.




Last edited by bonespawn at 10/31/2010 4:22:57 PM

This Post:
00
162827.7 in reply to 162827.6
Date: 11/1/2010 3:20:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
One "player" training seems a little bit of a waste to me imo. I still wouldnt even use it. If you want to train just one player just do "one position training."

Also if the game was to allow "one player training" then people would ask for "two player training" ect. ect. Then the position training would become useless.

So I agree with BB for shooting this idea down.

This Post:
00
162827.8 in reply to 162827.7
Date: 11/1/2010 11:05:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Thanks for your insight, but I think we already established that there is no point to this discussion.

This Post:
00
162827.9 in reply to 162827.1
Date: 11/6/2010 2:33:35 AM
BC Hostivař
První liga
Overall Posts Rated:
13111311
Second Team:
Jirkov
I'm not for your idea, because I can't imagine who would use it unless the training is quicker than usual single position training. Even for farm teams training for NT's it's not needed as they don't care about playing out of position. But I agree training bigmen at PG to get passing or outside def. training is boring. I personally use such a trainings quite often, but in my eyes there has been still very few teams which has been able to adapt well at present training rules even with changing positions for defence. As a NT manager I can say it's always very difficult to persuade managers for out of position trainings. I would suggest some new training options like every single trainings available on SF, this should be probably acceptable to use for much more teams than using present out of position trainings.

This Post:
00
162827.10 in reply to 162827.9
Date: 11/6/2010 3:46:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
SF demands lowest wage (compared with others), therefore I think that this position have to be hardest to get.

From: Cydius

This Post:
11
162827.11 in reply to 162827.9
Date: 11/6/2010 3:41:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
Every position should have single training available with limitation like PG can't have inside skill single training.

SG - SF should have single training for OD PA etc...
PG - SF should have single training for JR
PF - SF should have single training for IS ID
PF should have single training for Block
etc

If you look at the training system a SF trainee has to play anything but SF to progress in single training, PF too . it makes no sense.

You want to train your SG ? he should play SG, you want your C to have some SG skill ? he should play SG.


This Post:
00
162827.14 in reply to 162827.13
Date: 11/7/2010 5:34:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5252
tips : single > multiple > team

If you have to use a less efficient training then there is a little problem with the system :)

Advertisement