Second Quarter Rankings
*covers through 11 games
**First seven games are INTRAconference while the remaining four games are INTERconference. INTRAconf games are worth a maximum of 4 pts per game while INTERconf games are worth a max of 7 pts. To understand the difficulty of achieving the maximum points, it requires the player to record a Hollinger Game Score far greater than anyone else for the set of games. I grade every performance by the players on a bell curve.
*Prior games can fluxuate on the curve. This is done so that past scores have the possibility of actually looking better or worse depending on how the rest of the league performs throughout the season.
*Only games that count are the games where a player records a minimum of 16 minutes of action, or 1/3rd of the standard 48 minutes.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1703053/BuzzerBeater/PPR.XIV.Q2.p...A couple statistics based off these rankings:
Big XIII had 43 players while the Great XIII had 32 players in the Top 75. This indicates that the Big XIII players are giving better performances and considering we have only seen four INTERconference matchups, that says a lot about the quality of competition the Big XIII provides as compared to the Great XIII. For example, my Chicago Goats are playing well under what they are actually capable of playing and the rankings show just that.
Percentage of RATINGS
Wonderous: 2.67%
Tremendous: 2.67%
Sensational: 4.00%
Prolific: 30.67%
Prominent: 20.00%
Proficient: 13.33%
Strong: 15.67%
Respectable: 12.00%