BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 3-2 Vs 1-3-1

3-2 Vs 1-3-1

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
16539.5 in reply to 16539.4
Date: 2/19/2008 11:49:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
especially passing from the PG and a it less important from the SG and SF the influence from the big men is not so high.

But i think the handling and driving have also an influence on this, but i can't say it exactly maybe someone with more knowledge could say you more.

This Post:
00
16539.6 in reply to 16539.5
Date: 2/20/2008 3:22:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
About 50% pg 30% sg 20% SF.

This Post:
00
16539.7 in reply to 16539.6
Date: 3/1/2008 1:39:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
when a team plays 1-3-1 does that mean the PF's contribution is also added to the Perimeter defense rating?

has anyone examples of the difference in rebounding when they have played 3v2 vs when they played 1-3-1?

any links to games where 1-3-1 has been used would be great...

This Post:
00
16539.8 in reply to 16539.7
Date: 3/1/2008 1:46:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
if the 1-3-1 is anything like in real life then the PF positions himself at the free throw line with the point guard in front of him. i don't think that counts as perimeter defense but it is definitely further out than he would normally play.

This Post:
00
16539.9 in reply to 16539.8
Date: 3/1/2008 1:53:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
sorry excuse my ignorance... i am toying whether to play this later or not... advantages are higher perimeter defence... downside is RB loss.... is the gain and loss equally balanced in your opinion or would i be sacrificing more ID/RB for the sake of just a little extra OD

This Post:
00
16539.10 in reply to 16539.9
Date: 3/1/2008 2:04:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
you would be sacrificing more ID/RB as 4 of your players will be closer to the perimeter.

This Post:
00
16539.11 in reply to 16539.10
Date: 3/1/2008 2:25:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
so to play 1-3-1 effectively you need to have a big mismatch in skills from both teams... 1 team must be totally guard dominant with no inside threat to worry about...the other team i suppose must have enought ID/RB to take care of whatever is necessary inside the paint then can gang up to try and reduce the point tally of the opps guards...

cheers

This Post:
00
16539.12 in reply to 16539.7
Date: 3/2/2008 1:28:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
when a team plays 1-3-1 does that mean the PF's contribution is also added to the Perimeter defense rating?


I think that is the theory that is behind it, but I think the mechanism (the calculation of the ratings) works diffrently.
Instead of splitting up your team in PG - SG/SF/PF - C, and take the first 2 groups for outside defense calculation. I think the team is always taken as a whole, and outside as well as inside def is calculated the exact same way every time (see rules: outside D: guards weighted heavily,...). Then depending on your tactic these ratings get adapted. If you choose 1-3-1, your outside D will get a decent booze, but your inside D rating will get a penalty, as will your rebounding.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
16539.13 in reply to 16539.12
Date: 3/3/2008 3:05:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
If you choose 1-3-1, your outside D will get a decent booze

I think my outside D is getting too much booze as it is. Some tips to make them less tipsy would be appreaciated.

This Post:
00
16539.14 in reply to 16539.13
Date: 3/3/2008 8:32:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
lol, I meant boost.
Damn, now I uncovered their secret...
oh well.

(oh man, did I realy type booze... what was I thinking?)

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.