BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Motion vs. 3-2

Motion vs. 3-2

Set priority
Show messages by
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
197095.5 in reply to 197095.1
Date: 9/25/2011 7:46:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
to be honest you could have used that game also to say LI isn't effective, for just throwing an example in.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
197095.7 in reply to 197095.6
Date: 9/25/2011 7:57:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
68 points? LI could be easily should down by man to man ;)

Also BB King reason why this win isn't surprising, and it is not a good offense production on both side.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
55
197095.9 in reply to 197095.8
Date: 9/25/2011 8:05:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
then next time drink 10 beers less, before you believe that scoring 68 points with the better team is a great achievement.

From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
197095.11 in reply to 197095.4
Date: 9/25/2011 8:11:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
What do You want to prove by showing match with PG with 3k salary? ;-)
Only reasonable conclusion from this match is that PG with 3k salary decreases chance to win match ;-)
All other conclusions have no sense because importance of weak PG and SG is much greater than impact of tactics.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
197095.13 in reply to 197095.12
Date: 9/25/2011 6:53:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
This game is a really bad example for any point...

This Post:
00
197095.15 in reply to 197095.10
Date: 9/27/2011 8:52:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3636
As B.B.King said, the game was lost more because Fumoffu played weak players at PG and SG. Imagine, a 3k PG being defended by a 17k PG. the match-up was a mismatch. But the game was close. Maybe Kanazawa Kings have bad perimeter defenders, that even with a 3-2 and more effort, only produced a strong team rating for perimeter defense and a very close game.

Advertisement