it is chaos since this lead to configuration where 2 player like to play the same position ;) And it is weird that the game changes around backup in priority, hey don't give Kobe the Ball anymore Mettaworld peace is on court ;) And if it the other way round, the coach ahd to sub like an icehocky game to make it still fitting.
Else you nearly have to create priority list, for nearly all possible lineup quite easy when you coach a game himself, but pretty much work if you bring it on paper or into an lineup here.
Edit: And yes i know that the Kobe example is offence, since most star are more defined through offense and i am the big nba expert ;) But often you make it comfortable for the stars, and those defences switch are always decision looking at the whole lineup, and one change always need at least one other change, and there would be chaos.
Edit2: maybe an NBA example which fits
Dalas
PG: Kidd(def PG) - Beaubois(def. SG)
SG: Carter(def SG) - Terry(def. PG)
With both combos on court it makes sense, and will most likely be like that. But when Beaubpois come in for Kidd, did you really think that Carter will defend the one? Also the assigment on Kidd and Terry on the court, will most likely decided on the lineup of the opposition at the time, and not let Terry always defend the one, since he is more important as a back up ;)
Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/29/2012 1:42:29 PM