BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Allowing different deffence strategy for the starters

Allowing different deffence strategy for the starters

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
207535.6 in reply to 207535.5
Date: 1/29/2012 4:19:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
This is a good suggestion that I've already saw.
But it is not relevant to this discussion.
Moreover - you are suggesting adding a new deffence strategy, this suggestion is about allowing to define a different strategy for the Starters and their Backups.

This Post:
00
207535.8 in reply to 207535.7
Date: 1/29/2012 8:51:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
ok ok its your suggest :(:(:(:(:(
i'll go like a little puppy to my own hole!!
The point is that no good will come from having a completely different suggestion at the same thread.

Last edited by Pini פיני at 1/29/2012 8:52:25 AM

This Post:
00
207535.10 in reply to 207535.9
Date: 1/29/2012 9:56:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
ok ok its your suggest :(:(:(:(:(
i'll go like a little puppy to my own hole!!
The point is that no good will come from having a completely different suggestion at the same thread.

you are a dreamer!!!
no good will come from any thread these days xddddddddddddd
I hope and believe that something will.
The question is why you are using those thread if you don't believe they have any essence?...

This Post:
00
207535.12 in reply to 207535.3
Date: 1/29/2012 11:16:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
When one of the starters is subbed, and his backup had been defined differently than he has, than all relevant players will play upon the backup definitions.


is pretty much chaos imho for me, to combine it ;)

This Post:
00
207535.13 in reply to 207535.12
Date: 1/29/2012 1:15:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
When a starter is substitute then...
if( starterDefenceStrategy(subPlaer) != backupDefenceStrategy(subPlaer) )
then use backupDefenceStrategy(subPlaer)
In addition, perform verification on player that is (starterDefenceStrategy(thatPlayer) == backupDefenceStrategy(subPlaer) ),
and update accordingly.
Repeat that until there is no more players to update their deffence strategy.

As it is already half coded, than no... It is not chaos, and not hard to impelement

This Post:
00
207535.14 in reply to 207535.13
Date: 1/29/2012 1:23:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
it is chaos since this lead to configuration where 2 player like to play the same position ;) And it is weird that the game changes around backup in priority, hey don't give Kobe the Ball anymore Mettaworld peace is on court ;) And if it the other way round, the coach ahd to sub like an icehocky game to make it still fitting.

Else you nearly have to create priority list, for nearly all possible lineup quite easy when you coach a game himself, but pretty much work if you bring it on paper or into an lineup here.

Edit: And yes i know that the Kobe example is offence, since most star are more defined through offense and i am the big nba expert ;) But often you make it comfortable for the stars, and those defences switch are always decision looking at the whole lineup, and one change always need at least one other change, and there would be chaos.

Edit2: maybe an NBA example which fits
Dalas
PG: Kidd(def PG) - Beaubois(def. SG)
SG: Carter(def SG) - Terry(def. PG)

With both combos on court it makes sense, and will most likely be like that. But when Beaubpois come in for Kidd, did you really think that Carter will defend the one? Also the assigment on Kidd and Terry on the court, will most likely decided on the lineup of the opposition at the time, and not let Terry always defend the one, since he is more important as a back up ;)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/29/2012 1:42:29 PM

Advertisement