The thing i think will be hard to over come is that you have worse players then everyone at every position except perhaps SF then. It will be weighted back in the secondary skill advantage. Sadly not enough i think.
I dont know what offense that would fit well for this kind of team build. Perhaps the isolation offenses.
And i dont think htis will work very well on higher levels where you really need good SF's to not get totally owned at every position. And that will cost a LOT of money.
I love these kind of ideas though and would love to see them in action.
I agree. Obviously it would depend on how each player is built, but if you're training up a whole team, I would assume they'd look fairly similar. Say even if you build up 5 freak players who have "tremendous" on all skills. It's a mismatch because of how well rounded they are for sure, but is "tremendous" inside D or outside D going to be enough to adequately defend a skilled G, or a well built PF/C? The rebounding discrepancy as well- again, even a team with "tremendous" rebounders on the floor at all 5 positions would ostensibly lose out pretty significantly to a team with a couple good rebounders at PF/C and a competent one at SF.
I think this strategy would work extremely well at the lower levels, these well rounded SF would be much more affordable than the standard players you'd otherwise be able to pay, but as you get to the upper levels, where teams are already very well-rounded, it would be difficult to overcome the skill differences in the primary categories.