BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Defense bug?

Defense bug?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Milly

This Post:
00
24361.5 in reply to 24361.1
Date: 4/15/2008 7:47:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
I can't make any sense of this, so maybe it's a bug.
I hope you have noticed that you met two different teams in these matches?
- And some other differences as well ...?

Older than the rest ...
From: Emilio

This Post:
00
24361.6 in reply to 24361.1
Date: 4/15/2008 8:11:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
I guess you had a higher enthusiasm in the second match. Maybe the enthusiasm still afects somehow the defense rating?

¡Me aburro! (Homer Simpson)
From: brian

This Post:
00
24361.7 in reply to 24361.5
Date: 4/15/2008 10:09:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I mentioned all the key differences under "intangible". I didn't think the opposing team had an effect on my team ratings.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: brian

This Post:
00
24361.8 in reply to 24361.6
Date: 4/15/2008 10:13:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Enthusiasm would have been lower in the 2nd game. TIE'd the first, normal a game in between the two, and then TIE'd again in the 2nd. My enthusiasm is usually at least 9 or 10, so it drops quick if I don't constantly TIE.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
24361.9 in reply to 24361.7
Date: 4/15/2008 10:23:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I mentioned all the key differences under "intangible". I didn't think the opposing team had an effect on my team ratings.

Well, we all know that "no skill is completely useless at any position". And the difference of 1 visible level might be as little as X.99 to Y.01 -- potentially pretty intangible as well. Though I also agree the opposing team probably has no effect on your ratings.

The difference in ratings is so minimal that it might be from the different PF.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 4/15/2008 10:23:47 AM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
24361.10 in reply to 24361.9
Date: 4/15/2008 10:27:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3636
Or different Game Shape of players...

This Post:
00
24361.11 in reply to 24361.9
Date: 4/15/2008 10:27:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
If so, then what's the point of playing a 3-2 zone? If you're going to get little to no gain at perimeter defense, I should just go with 2-3 zone instead and get the inside benefits.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: brian

This Post:
00
24361.12 in reply to 24361.10
Date: 4/15/2008 10:30:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
-GS for PG-SF was only +1 for the 2nd game

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Wixix

This Post:
00
24361.13 in reply to 24361.12
Date: 4/15/2008 10:42:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3636
Ever this small difference could have changed ratings by decimals...

This Post:
00
24361.14 in reply to 24361.13
Date: 4/15/2008 10:45:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
So the small difference could have changed ratings by decimals.

What about the fact that there should be a substantial change for 3-2 Zone compared to 2-3 Zone?

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
24361.15 in reply to 24361.14
Date: 4/15/2008 10:57:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I just went back and highlighted the def tactics, looks like some are missing this.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Advertisement