BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > D-League

D-League

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
253252.5 in reply to 253252.4
Date: 1/2/2014 5:54:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
111111
i thought of it as a place to send scrubby guys, and they get maybe 25% training speed of normal training, in some randomized kinda way (cause face it, guys in D-leagues either never really make it pro, or turn out all kinds of interesting)...

Somewhere I'd send allstar potential kinda guys that are home-grown, but I'd rather not cut for cutting's sake (merchandise profit)

This Post:
00
253252.6 in reply to 253252.5
Date: 1/2/2014 8:20:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
144144
Danny Green, Marcin Gortat, and Dorell Wright emerged from the D-League and had sucessful careers. Anyways, thats the general idea of it, send scrubby guys, recieve less scrubby guys.

This Post:
11
253252.7 in reply to 253252.6
Date: 1/2/2014 8:50:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
There are actually quite a few good threads in the suggestions forum that are around possible solutions for a D-League.

The idea has been thrown about previously quite a bit.

In general, the idea was that it would solve a few different 'problems' that currently exist with BB.

a) Draft picks - 75% of picks get fired/sold straight away, if not more. The idea of a D-league would help provide some level of interest with draft picks.
b) Training of draft picks - as above with point a), but obviously with a training component. Who knew that Benchwarmer potential players could get trained!
c) Mid-high level young players - This is the point you made originally, $5k-$10k salary young guys who could come into certain leagues and make an impact straight away.

It is a shame we don't have draftee's who are able to be star's straight away, because thats what the NBA is like, as seen by this year's NBA picks who are starting 5 on some teams. The unfortunately reality is that if we had rookies starting on teams in Div I leagues, it would just ruin the game and a lot of the fundamentals of training etc etc but i think this is obvious to most people.

So yer look im all for it. How i imagine that it would work would be some kind of D-league where, you can just send players and, they play games and get some kind of training. and thats it. No need for setting lineup's or anything like that, these games wouldn't be games that you would manage. Heck your guys would probably play with other teams D-league nominee's.......
It's like an extension of the box score that you get whilst scouting them. You could just nominate players to play in D-league each week ... which makes them unavailable for league and scrimmage - and you get a box score and they get random training. (full 48 mins). Maybe there needs to be a small cost associated with this, or maybe you need to nominate a player for 3 weeks at a time or something like that.

I think the concept should be simple - no game engine interaction, and it should try to solve the above listed problems.

This Post:
00
253252.8 in reply to 253252.7
Date: 1/2/2014 11:42:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Very close voting 14-13-8 right now. It isn't going to happen with such a split opinion.

This Post:
11
253252.9 in reply to 253252.8
Date: 1/3/2014 1:10:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
144144
Technically, it's 22-13, since the 8 represents people who think it's a good idea, but it needs some changes. I still doubt it'll affect the game though.

This Post:
00
253252.10 in reply to 253252.9
Date: 1/3/2014 5:38:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
It is good idea mate. I kinda like it!:)

This Post:
00
253252.11 in reply to 253252.1
Date: 1/6/2014 11:55:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
Voting right now is 23-16-11, because I accidentally clicked 'Nay' instead of 'Yay'.

This Post:
00
253252.13 in reply to 253252.12
Date: 1/7/2014 11:08:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
I'm not smart enough to think of something like that.

This Post:
00
253252.14 in reply to 253252.13
Date: 1/7/2014 11:40:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
It feels like this idea takes too much work. And it won't help save BB's current state. So, no I'm against it.

This Post:
00
253252.15 in reply to 253252.12
Date: 1/10/2014 8:15:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I, myself, am against a D-League system by the way.

Why?
In most D.I leagues and D.II leagues of big countries it is near impossible to train two players from 18y old up. You can get away with training one player as you can "hide" him in cup and scrimmage games, but you are so limited in what you can do when you are competitive that most of people regress back to D.II if they want to train.

Sending youngsters do D-league makes a lot of sense. You wouldn't have more training slots because of that and you would pay for it. You can choose not to of course. Right now the system gives no incentive to even be in D.I because:

- you can't train players efficiently
- you can't make any money so your team stagnates

So what would make someone motivate to play in D.I? Championship? You don't get any extra money because of it. You get a full arena for half a season, which normally covers your expenses you had in order to contend for a championship in first place.

I made more money and could train whatever I wanted in D.II. Usual profit was 140k - 200k per week without the cup. I think D-league would solve these problems.

EDIT: I'm sure this will give more incentive to join D.I. Think of it like some sort of award to be there. Sure you get 1M, but 1M in D.I is like a drop in the sea. Right now there is nothing to play for in D.I except glory...

Last edited by Koperboy at 1/10/2014 8:38:07 AM

Advertisement