BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Fair draft!

Fair draft!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
1010
323401.5 in reply to 323401.1
Date: 3/27/2024 1:28:38 PM
Wasted Potential
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Second Team:
Hazards to Society
While this may be a "fair draft" when it comes to national teams, it would not be fair when looking at a club level if I understand this correctly. If every nation is getting the same amount of rookies with 10 or 11 potential then those nations with a small amount of users are almost guaranteed to draft a 10 or 11 player in every draft, giving them a massive advantage on their club team.

I think having more users should be an advantage for a national team (I know that is easy to say as a USA user), but if you have more users you should have more good players to pick from and this encourages individual nations to grow their BB community (though I recognize that is much easier for some countries than others). However, I don't see why we should try and give 50 users the equal shot at a gold as 1200 users.

This Post:
00
323401.9 in reply to 323401.8
Date: 3/28/2024 12:48:52 AM
White Yar
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
993993
The two largest nations, Italy and Spain, receive only 2 19-year-old legends. It smells like justice))

This Post:
11
323401.13 in reply to 323401.11
Date: 3/28/2024 5:15:06 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12021202
Second Team:
Jirkov
suggestion 1: I'm fine with current % of having high potential, but it depends on BB-staff if there is some reason for descrease or increase it
suggestion 2: I don't like your idea. Even if there is a lot of managers like me who continue playing BB just because of National Teams you shouldn't lose balance in club features because of NTs. Even now if you play in league with a lot of bots your chance to draft high potential player from low draft position (10+ or even 16) is much higher than in league wihout bots even with higher draft position.

Advertisement