isn't 2 position training a 65%-+ training? and 3 position training 50%-45%?
Uhhh … I was pretty sure because with 2 pos at 65% it would be possible to train more players „more effecive“, example:
…
Which would mean that the more players you train the more effective it is … so training would just take longer (which might be balanced by less effectiveness due to aging) and would throw everything out of the window I believed 🤷♂️
I had to think about it and did some research: Sounds that I was wrong and 65% for 2- instead of 1-position-training is correct.
In general it leads me to stay the way, that developing a team with more width does not balance loosing the higher level of less players (since mostly 8 players are enough) and starting all over the next generation of trainees earlier:
Training lasts about 50% longer (1/0,65), a player (pot. 8) caps age 21/22 if trained the „most“ effective way. Reducing effectivity results in capping at about 23/24, under consideration of aging effects about 2 more seasons later … not only for NT-candidates it doesnt make much sense to me.
Last edited by LA-flaterik123 at 8/24/2024 3:20:52 AM
founded in S3 IV.5 (34234) - returned in S28 IV.7 (34515)