BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Committee for the Rights of Small Forwards

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
67212.5 in reply to 67212.4
Date: 1/4/2009 3:22:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i would agree with that opion from him ;)

Because it is not fair for the guys who already train SF, which is pretty valueable because of the more difficult training. Which gets less valueable when it becomes easier, and thre are also other skills a SF must have instead of defense, and it would make training pretty easy if you could train everything one position at every position, then you could argue also thats a center could pass a little bit and you never see tim duncan running as a point guard.

This Post:
00
67212.7 in reply to 67212.6
Date: 1/4/2009 3:49:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i believe first i understand it the first time to post this proposal ;)

And a sg/sf/pf/c needs passing to why he must play Pointguard to get optimal training? etc.

So making good Forwards is difficult, but not just for you even for the other managers, so it is fair in the end.

But maybe you don't read what i write.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/4/2009 3:49:55 PM

This Post:
00
67212.8 in reply to 67212.7
Date: 1/4/2009 3:53:46 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
muhahah get the users fighting amognst themselves instead of against the BBs.. i like it ;)

but in all seriousness... once again we do face the issue of change causing unfairness because teams had expectations about the rules being one way and now changing.... sigh.. i wish i had a time machine so all these could be fixed.


This Post:
00
67212.10 in reply to 67212.9
Date: 1/4/2009 4:01:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
yeah it is hard for SF trainers, but also they got the chanche to keep pretty good Sf, or sell then for a good value ;)

So it hits you at the end to.

But if you change it now, you punish the trainer who did it already because it was pretty easy, for other managers to clone there SF which they have trained in playing them in wrong positions. Thats reduce their value, which adjust the lost game they got sometimes why they play their player at wrong position.

PS: i should up with your beginning post, when you sayy you was my opion and in the end it wasn't mine ;) Thats sounds more like a fed ad which ended in the wrong forum.

This Post:
00
67212.12 in reply to 67212.11
Date: 1/4/2009 4:08:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
every change pisses off someone. it only has to be announced well in advance, so that nobody gets screwed up by last minute adjustments.


should be pretty well announce before ... Because to train a SF could take years, and when you start a lot with defence and another one maybe with JS, he will reach the other one level easy.

And actually there are also good SF, sometimes they go from a C trainer to a Guard trainer in their development, sometimes teams change there training good etc.

I don't see the need for a change. Which is totally impossible when i understand what you write, so i had really hard problems to understand you.

This Post:
00
67212.14 in reply to 67212.13
Date: 1/4/2009 4:22:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
there are more then you believe who have this odd concept ;)


This Post:
00
67212.15 in reply to 67212.14
Date: 1/4/2009 5:55:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
As a SF trainer, I say please do not make any changes! Sure, it is hard to train SFs. Hopefully that means that good ones are rare. As a consequence, I should get lots of cash when I decide to sell my guys. I see nothing wrong with that.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
Advertisement