I play HT too. There you play twice a week, one for your championship, the other cup or friendly. Not much different than here, considering that RS is far less critical in BB because of PO (while in HT you can win 13 and loose 1 in RS and not get promoted).
The main difference is that in HT you think you can easily set your team, just arranging 11 players based on one single core skill (and I have to say that flash interface is much friendly and richer in contents). Here you have to look at 5 on the field + 5 backups + 2 more, trying to capture which is the best P or PF (and you know the "preset" role is not necessarily the good one). That scares people, unless you love basket: football is more universally played, and the skill "attack" high easily suggest you that as an attacker. Here a G have at least 3-4 skills to look at, and even with some experience you can experience some trouble.
That is the feeling you have in HT. The reality is much far away. There are plenty of programs you can use to define team and tune it, and the results can change over 20-30% in comparison with common sense. I just read a 10-pages long guide to "your best number 10", understanding (and confirming just trying in my latest friendly match) that common sense does not fit with GE.
HT can be perceived as "easy to play", as many people plays football. BB cannot be.
At the end of the day, the time you can spend on both is comparable, although BB can require some more due to the lack of solid, easy-to-understand statistics (look at the tons of graphs you can have through utilities in HT, not basic ones that are definitely useless), ease of setting your team, basket mechanisms replicated by GE, and a general minor understanding of basketball ground rules.
Last edited by GM-BlackMouse at 1/7/2009 11:58:16 AM