BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Position Height

Position Height

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
92084.6 in reply to 92084.5
Date: 6/2/2009 6:41:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You obviously already know this but smaller players train faster in handling and taller more in rebounding and etc. The PG needs slightly more handling then the SG (since he has the ball most of the time) that why I think the SG should be slightly taller( he doesnt have to be).

This Post:
00
92084.7 in reply to 92084.4
Date: 6/2/2009 6:44:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Plus i see no reason why you have no-one suited to be the heights 6'7 or 6'8, surely it would make more sense to have SF from 6'3-6'9

This Post:
00
92084.9 in reply to 92084.8
Date: 6/2/2009 8:05:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
ni he is arguing that a PG is more limited through the hight then a SG who train less Passing/handling - Jumpshot the training he most likely get is nearly height neutral ...

So the key for size is the bit handling and passing training and mainly the OD, where the PG need it for all primary trainings.

This Post:
00
92084.11 in reply to 92084.10
Date: 6/2/2009 11:01:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Wow im pretty sure i never said taller SGs are better I just said that they dont need to be as short since they use less handling training then a PG.
Do you understand what im saying now?

This Post:
00
92084.13 in reply to 92084.12
Date: 6/3/2009 4:48:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Wow im pretty sure i never said taller SGs are better I just said that they dont need to be as short since they use less handling training then a PG.
Do you understand what im saying now?

No, it still doesn't make any sense, especially given that all outside skills are affected by height, not only Handling.


i find it easy ;)

He don't want the sg to be tall, but you don't argue that a PG must be 1.75 right? So you doesn't mean that players need the optimal hight everytime ;)

A bit higher is ok in your eyes - and he thinks you could make more compremises with a Sg then a PG with the hight, because the training of the SG isn't affected that much of the height then the one of the PG.

Edit: Oh is see he make a higher sign in it for the SG in this case you a right this don't make any sense ;)

I just thought he give them a bit more maximum hight.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 6/3/2009 4:49:48 AM

This Post:
00
92084.14 in reply to 92084.10
Date: 6/3/2009 12:43:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
This still doesn't explain how taller SGs are better.


Very small players will get higher prices when transferred. This means they are more costly for you at acquisition. If the economic system is in balance in wouold be wasting resources not to develop the dwarf talents into PGs.

I found this proposed rational quite convincing

Advertisement