BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Atrocious staff for new managers justified using math?

Atrocious staff for new managers justified using math?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
221642.50 in reply to 221642.48
Date: 9/21/2012 12:30:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
If any team goes bankrupt, it's not due to the salary floor. It's due to all the money mismanagement that took place well beforehand. Theoretically.

I think you're really reaching here.

Look plenty of teams go bankrupt because they can't manage money properly and I'm perfectly okay with that. But in this case the team that promotes ends up making LESS money than if it didn't promote, because of salary floor, despite featuring a roster perfectly adequate for avoiding relegation in their first season. Talk about an incentive to promote... Now I agree that going bankrupt would require many particular circumstances that are very unrealistic in most cases, yes.

Honestly, it looks like fixes being implemented over previous fixes to fix problems created by fixes themselves, and where is it going to end? Trim this fix-puzzle down. All this tanking is because the fan logic is flawed.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
00
221642.51 in reply to 221642.50
Date: 9/21/2012 12:39:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
Your debate aside, the salary floor is still an excellent anti-tanking measure IMO. In fact you're the first person that I've seen that doesn't seem to think this is the case.

But they're never going to be able implement a change that has an 100% approval rating. That's obviously not realistic. But that doesn't mean that doing nothing is the proper step either. But making a change that looks like a step in the proper direction by a huge majority is still a positive move.

This Post:
00
221642.52 in reply to 221642.51
Date: 9/21/2012 1:02:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
Your debate aside, the salary floor is still an excellent anti-tanking measure IMO. In fact you're the first person that I've seen that doesn't seem to think this is the case.

No actually I DO think it works fine on tanking. It's just that it creates other problems.

But they're never going to be able implement a change that has an 100% approval rating. That's obviously not realistic. But that doesn't mean that doing nothing is the proper step either. But making a change that looks like a step in the proper direction by a huge majority is still a positive move.

I agree, as long as it's temporary, until they make fans that actually voice their displeasure when a team that has money and is heading to the bottom doesn't use it to prevent relegation.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme