BuzzerBeater Forums

I agree, it would be great if BB's could let people know about beyond that post in the sticky, maybe a mass bb-mail (or even a sticky post of itself would be better)? It seems like the only ones that know about it (including myself) are those that got burned by it once or twice and come to the bugs forum to report it.

GE / sub bug, here's my lineup for tonight:

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y271/brianjames34/lineup...)

See the PG set with no backups, and a reserve PF. When the game went to blowout:

Center stayed in the lineup
Reserve PF subbed for PG

Stayed like this the whole 4th quarter. Have never seen this happen before.

Here's the boxscore (36159560)

Last edited by brian at 10/1/2011 10:01:25 PM

Just noticed that the guy i had a reserve PF (Sibrioli) is labeled as a PG.

This is interesting as Ive had issues with playing, say, a PG at C for 48 or C at PG (basically, playing well out of position) and the player will get 47+ mins and then randomly get subbed out.

I wonder if, based on the issue tonight and the other example, there is some line of code that is accidental overriding SFDC and the depth chart settings and then switching things around in an LCD manner.

that or its just a coincidence that a PG-labeled reserve PF randomly ignores the SFDC and tactical settings and subs in for a PG.

You should had lined Goddard as Starter, Backup and Reserve, I do this and I don't have problems :D

I don't do this and have never had problems in the past, prob close to 100 times or more.

Well said.

Yesterday I had the conference final and I found this crap

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/39222723/boxscore.aspx

some players of the starting five was on the bench, rotation players and reserves was in the starting five and all players were not in their role.

I had more enthusiasm and form with slightly lower ratings .... I could win or lose but i can't accept something like that ...

and if I go to "weekly statistics" I find this:

Jacinto Anero 48 48 strong
Ojars Kublinš 27 13 2 5 8 strong
Szymon Korejwo 25 18 5 2 valid
Amadeu Vilageli 25 9 10 5 1 strong
Leon Frederick 24 12 7 4 sufficient
Diamantis Klapadakis 23 4 11 8 valid
Peter-Jan Belder 20 7 6 6 is valid
Marcelis Žmoginas 8 9 19 2 valid
Bruno Del Bottegone 15 3 8 4 strong
Ivan Viola 14 1 5 2 6 is valid


The last time I logged in before the begin of the match i'm sure at all that it was all correct ... indeed I had already deployed the starting lineup on Friday ....

Today i went to the page of the tactics and i selected "Load Former Match Tactics:" of the last game and i discovered that no player was selected except for the pg and sg backup that was anero who play 48 mins.
(the tactic was "to strictly follow...")


So what i gotta do with this bug that ruined me all the season and more (i'm in a big passive with economics...)???

(39447320)

This morning I was setting up the lineup for my scrimmage on my mobile phone, the offensive and defensive tactics were the ones that I chose, but only 1 player was in the lineup when I confirmed that I put 9 players in the lineup.

Can some BB clarify me if some bug happened or is it my phone's fault?

A few others have reported it, and if this thread wasn't 510 posts long I'd find it for you, but I believe it was a case of setting your lineup, then using the browser to go back to the tactics page, and it'd set it as 1 player. This seems to be a known bug that I presume is on their list or things to work on.

On Wednesday between the game and assemble my team for the cup match, were to play only those who had played few minutes on Saturday and Tuesday. PPOR other side had to play relaxed.

Today I go back and watch the game I played over in my full and normal ..... I can do to review my order and I solve this problem ....

Because now my owners played very many minutes.
Thanks to that I can help.

Someone who can help me?