BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Ideal Power Forward

Ideal Power Forward

Set priority
Show messages by
From: er1k

This Post:
00
270992.52 in reply to 270992.51
Date: 6/23/2015 3:21:23 PM
Berlin Street Style
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
7676
Well, I see it like this:

Why try to build great allround bigs (i.e. with decent outside skills) if you go for non-allround guards (and maybe SF)?
If you go allround on every position, you don't face salary problems with RB on your smaller players and you can play pretty much any offense you like.

Message deleted
This Post:
11
270992.55 in reply to 270992.49
Date: 6/23/2015 5:30:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3434
Thanks for those ideas. I've recently become aware of the importance of SB so will be training that to a fairly high level. I'll experiment with princeton too to see what the offence looks like.

This Post:
00
270992.57 in reply to 270992.56
Date: 6/26/2015 7:06:49 AM
Stavanger Titans
III.6
Overall Posts Rated:
19741974
Second Team:
The Vikings
Range (to 12), passing (to 10) and than split Inner defense and inner shot

Hell Ya - We are coming from the North to conquer your arena ...
From: E.B.W.

This Post:
00
270992.58 in reply to 270992.56
Date: 6/26/2015 4:46:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
For a PF or SF? If you want him to be a PF, he needs rebounding at least to 12 and even 12 might be pushing it, if you are going the SF route then more outside shooting and passing (passing to at least 13).

Last edited by E.B.W. at 6/26/2015 4:47:18 PM

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
This Post:
00
270992.59 in reply to 270992.54
Date: 6/29/2015 5:55:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5353
i think 6-7 sf builds would be a hard team to beat, its the direction ive been working in the last 2 seasons actually

This Post:
11
270992.60 in reply to 270992.50
Date: 7/1/2015 4:43:37 PM
Optic Fibres
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
562562
Second Team:
Wānaka Lakers
I completely agree with Manon on this, rebounding takes up a bit of cap space too on guards and that's annoying. I've recently spent close to a million on a 6'3'' trainee and he has 7 RB which is higher than what I wanted but his other skills allowed me to brush that aside and build him as a good SG. Now don't get me wrong, I love my forwards and C rebounding but I personally think it's a waste of time on guards as repeating what Manon said, it adds a lot of salary when salary does increase. Valid point for your reasoning though, that's the beauty of the game too, different managers having different ideas.

From: TKOK

To: js8
This Post:
00
270992.61 in reply to 270992.60
Date: 7/5/2015 5:49:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
I am currently training a PF. I feel that rebound is pretty important, especially for the NT as the opponents don't let everything in, and a couple of OR or DR are pretty neat.
His current status is
12 8 11 - 14 14 11 - 16 15 17 13
Hopefully there is still some capspace for an additional JS/DR/IS. Gonna try anyway.

Advertisement