BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 6 Changes

Season 6 Changes

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Ehud

This Post:
00
40617.51 in reply to 40617.41
Date: 7/29/2008 5:03:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
274274
Hey Charles,

Teams who will take the championship this upcoming playoff and will be promoted to a higher league will also enjoy the money reward or is it only relevent for the next season?

I think it will be wrong to not reward those teams, couse if so, they will "suffer" the new laws in the higher leagues "40%" 25%" but wont get the pluses of the new economic system (rewards)

"Did you miss me??? - "With every bullet so far..." Al Bundy
From: PISolo

This Post:
00
40617.52 in reply to 40617.48
Date: 7/29/2008 5:42:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
i like to program my work....
but if every season there is some radical news i can't have an optimal strategy....

stop to change every season....


This Post:
00
40617.54 in reply to 40617.52
Date: 7/29/2008 6:17:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
308308

I like changes, adapt or die!!!XDDD

It makes the game more fun and versatile.

This Post:
00
40617.55 in reply to 40617.49
Date: 7/29/2008 6:20:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00

(BTW, having a cushion is good management, not pure luck)

Actually, having a cushion is likely bad management, since you're not utilizing your resources to the maximum. Well, of course, if you expect a 25% cut in revenue in the end of any given season, it might be the right thing to do.

That's exactly my point: maximum utilization is not optimal (read "The Goal"). Call those provisions if you will. I would actually advocate have any team keep at least 3 weeks of average revenue in cash.

But hey, that's just me not having to find cash somewhere (sell players?) because I'm borderline broke since I utilized my resources to the maximum :-)

This Post:
00
40617.56 in reply to 40617.50
Date: 7/29/2008 6:23:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Having a cushion on runaway inflation is bad management.

edit: @kozlodoev: man you're fast

Fast, but not completely correct (see my answer to his argument).

Now about your comment: yes, inflation decreases the value of my cushion. But by how much? And how much flexibility do I gain with respect to sepnding every dime I own?

I'm OK with the value of my cushion decreasing by even 10% every season if it allows me to be more flexible in my choices and my reactions.

I have a feeling that some of our friends who are complaining about the changes are those who maximize their resource utilization :-)

This Post:
00
40617.57 in reply to 40617.20
Date: 7/29/2008 6:26:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
We are also making changes to the Cup and B3. For both competitions, instead of earning gate receipts depending upon the home team attendance, teams will get a fixed amount of money in each round. A table listing the payouts for each round will be placed in the rules before next season.

Let me get it straight... if I am unlucky enough to play a division I team in the first round I won't even have the advantage of a higher arena income?

Honestly I was hoping for a *even* better attendance system, where a division IV team playing home against a DI would see its arena sold out, no matter what, and an DI team playing home against a D-IV team would have half seats empty, no matter what.


This Post:
00
40617.59 in reply to 40617.58
Date: 7/29/2008 6:31:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Right, and the BBs have apologized for this already.

This Post:
00
40617.60 in reply to 40617.56
Date: 7/29/2008 6:32:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
i'm not a First Division trainer.

i'm in III division in Italy, but i really don't know why, just beacuse 2-3 teams have 25.000 stadium and play in easy First National Leagues, everyobod must pay.

i really don't know why...it's ridicolous that the strongest team in my national First Division receives same money from TV than the worst of the VI division..isn't it!?!?

now most of the teams who are playing in Playoff could prefer stay in his division than be upgrade...!

it's a paradox. bah

Advertisement