BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Defense Strategy

Defense Strategy

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
10661.52 in reply to 10661.51
Date: 1/4/2008 6:45:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
That's so true...

...

...

...

...

*NOT~!

This Post:
00
10661.53 in reply to 10661.40
Date: 1/4/2008 7:11:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I dont believe everything written in a Forum, but buzzerbeater is a new game and different to hattrick.. so i have to test some things and i guess.. 2:3 Zone works really well against stronger outside offense.. of course i have to test it more..

I just want to go to second league this season, then I will see what happens..


In the last game i plaed often motion, because i'm knowing that my opponents usually play 2-3 Zone, and i mostly win and i'm not the one with the strogest roster. I hit only 30% of my 3 P shot, like in the other games but i made a lot of high percentage mid range shot.

And for the theorys that the 3p quote increase in the future, i don't think because the outside defense will be stronger in the future.

Edit: And you will also get the most defensive Boards with an 2-3 zone, because offensive Rebounds ain't so easy.

Edited by CrazyEye (1/4/2008 7:15:12 PM CET)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/4/2008 7:15:12 PM

This Post:
00
10661.54 in reply to 10661.52
Date: 1/4/2008 7:15:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
No the less...i think my point about man-to-man being better than zone defenses in terms of rebounding is still valid.

Here are a number of other sources that support my view:

http://www.coachesclipboard.net/ZoneDefense.html
3. There are not always clear-cut rebounding box-out assignments and sometimes the offensive player will slip inside for the offensive rebound and lay-up. See Zone Rebounding for help with this.

http://www.coachesclipboard.net/ZoneRebounding.html


Steve
Go Bruins!

This Post:
00
10661.55 in reply to 10661.54
Date: 1/4/2008 8:49:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Of course that's what happens when your zone defense fails. But that's the same with man-to-man when somebody did not box out his man well enough.

quoting out of your link:

Defensive rebounding can be either a weakness or a strength of the zone defense. On the positive side, you can put your "bigs" inside, keep them there and rebound missed shots. On the other hand, often there are not clear-cut box-out assignments when playing zone defense, especially when the zone is over-shifted or overloaded. Offensive players will try to penetrate the gaps in the zone, not only when trying to score, but also when rebounding. Zone defenses that don't box-out well will give up second and third shots.


+ when you play a 2-3 most of the offensive players or outside so they need to go to the basket and be in time to jump and pick the rebound (the need to travel a bit, which is not a lot but it's something) while the defenders are already there, picking the perfect position.

This Post:
00
10661.56 in reply to 10661.55
Date: 1/8/2008 9:30:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Don't want to beat a dead horse...but I think that quote supports my point about boxing out.


+ when you play a 2-3 most of the offensive players or outside so they need to go to the basket and be in time to jump and pick the rebound (the need to travel a bit, which is not a lot but it's something) while the defenders are already there, picking the perfect position.


Perhaps, but isn't the positioning of offensive players kind of up to the offense scheme???

Anyway, I'd be interested to hear what the BB's think about this since ultimately its there opinion that matter in terms of how the game is modeled. At least in the states in the college and pro ranks, zone defenses are usually used to force a team to shoot from the outside and/or to protect players in foul trouble or to slow tdown the game pace. Man-to-Man is usually used by the better defensive teams.


Steve
Go Bruins!