Its an interesting scenario for Leeroy, because, U21 team is out of the cup, there is nothing to gain for this season by keeping his current crop of U21's..... i mean the ones that are slated for National team duties yer, he is probably keeping, im not too sure. But why keep a 21 year old who isnt going to part of ur team next season? To reward the owner? Wouldnt that be very much not doing what is best for the U21 team?
There might also be some other logic behind his cuts... perhaps he has cut the players whos managers failed to keep their game shape in sufficient standing during the season? Maybe this contributed to why the team failed this season? If Lawrie doesnt train up as he likes, or i dont manage his game shape, then Leeroy should cut him from the team, so perhaps there is some of this going on as well.
The above is all speculation from myself, just to clarify for everyone. im not saying any of the above is truth, im just showing some different light on the matter which may or may not be true.
And ur right, lets not use Gab as an example cause he is NT prospect. But if you had U21 player that got cut halfway through season simply because the u21 was out of the cup, and this player didnt fit ur own teams balance/profile, then yer you probably would sell him.
But i guess thats my point. Leeroy shouldnt keep the U21 team together simply to appease the managers who supplied him the players. he should do what is best for the U21 team.
Real life example - Western Bulldogs - Brian Lake "Brian, you're awesome, but not going to player Full back next year.... we want to get a new backline up and running and develop them for the future, and we dont see you being part of that in the next 3-5 years. So you're going to play in the forward line ok?"
Brian - "screw you, im signing with Hawthorn".
Last edited by Coach Regan at 10/11/2012 8:45:15 AM