BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S23

BuzzerBeaterBest ---> S23 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Samu13

This Post:
00
238298.53 in reply to 238298.52
Date: 5/23/2013 6:08:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
136136
In the first game you took 30 rebound less than your opponent and committed so much fouls, in both games your PG and SG shooted bad so it hadn't been a problem of the 2-3 zone, in fact in the second game your SF, PF and C had good percentage. In the majority happens this: (56026733) (52722624) (52722617) (23226) (23428) (56026839) (56026802)

From: Hunterz

This Post:
33
238298.54 in reply to 238298.53
Date: 5/23/2013 7:39:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
164164
In every one of those examples except one, the team running 2-3 had a lower OD rating than the opponents flow rating. The offense facing a 2-3 had a fairly large number of assists as well.

I might be the only one but I doubt its 2-3 thats broken; the players people are using in a 2-3 zone dont have the skillsets required to fit the tactic!

From: Samu13

This Post:
00
238298.55 in reply to 238298.54
Date: 5/24/2013 3:38:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
136136
In every one of those examples except one, the team running 2-3 had a lower OD rating than the opponents flow rating. The offense facing a 2-3 had a fairly large number of assists as well.

I might be the only one but I doubt its 2-3 thats broken; the players people are using in a 2-3 zone dont have the skillsets required to fit the tactic!


Also in that examples posted by eziic is the same thing: (55707019) (52402625)

Advertisement