Regarding the INFO, thanks! [Both to you and to Foto].
Regarding the "mistake" I've made - you are right, I've used 10 players for this game, although I did set that player on "all of the three" (Starter, Backup and Reserve - SB&R) on a single position.
Regarding "reading the threads" - I cannot read every thread that had been published.
I am trying to read some from time to time, mainly at the Suggestion thread.
I have suggested to have some kind of an index (and sub-index) for repeating quesitons / subjects.
In case they where, all those repetitions (like mine) would have been "saved".
Regarding what I think is expected (at least in my POV):
1) I believe that a common user would expect that defining a single player as SB&R on a single position, especially when playing "Stricly follow depth chart", will lead to that player playing the full game (unless foul out or injured).
I think that the need of also having less than 10 players set to that game in order of having a full game is something expected to be on a game manual (In contradiction to which tactic is better for what and when , for example).
2) I believe that a user should get the option to choose how the SUBs will look like in a game, regardless on the number of players on the field. I believe that setting SB&R of a single position with a single player indicate enough, but if not, why not adding another field to the tactics that will define for the coach whether to keep a player on the field when the game is over (Garbage time), or even what to prefer - to win a game, or to train (the starter, or in general).
Anyhow, I've learnd my lesson.
Thanks for the information