BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - NBBA > Season 18 Smack

Season 18 Smack

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
200205.55 in reply to 200205.54
Date: 11/6/2011 10:58:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Most of their backups aren't that bad. In fact, in their PL game 2 days earlier, they played the same starters with more regular minutes and their ratings were slightly lower.

I've added the intangibles. Including his large lead in rebounding despite lower rebounding. It's still a mystery ;)

But I get it, I'll stop venting before I become the token complainer :p

This Post:
00
200205.58 in reply to 200205.55
Date: 11/6/2011 12:04:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Most of their backups aren't that bad.


starters -> backups in salary

pg: 73k -> 45k
sg: 100k -> 35k
sf: 35k -> 3k
pf: 135k -> 15k
c: 120 -> 100k

pretty significant downgrade at most positions there

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
200205.59 in reply to 200205.58
Date: 11/6/2011 12:53:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Hence me saying the word most. And I'm still not sure I understand your point. The pp100 factors in everyones skills and minutes, does it not? So everything being as it is, my being down 33 at one point still seems laughable.

And the offensive flow, I realize it's usefulness...PG is on the top of the 'To Improve' list.

It's just funny, if I had been the one who won big and been up by over 30 and they were on here complaining, I'm sure you'd be saying their inside defense was too low against my much stronger attack and their lower rebounding gave me lots of easy put backs, add that with their attacks being covered by my defense and 'I don't think that result is much of a mystery.' ;)

Its always much easier to justify a game with close ratings after you know who's won it ;)

This Post:
00
200205.60 in reply to 200205.59
Date: 11/6/2011 1:26:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Keep in mind that if a team takes significantly more shots than the other, then they don't need to be as efficient (PP100S) as the other team to win.


This Post:
00
200205.61 in reply to 200205.59
Date: 11/6/2011 1:29:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
556556
Hey! Its my job to complain around here! No one is going to out complain me!

Ricky Logsdon is the reason for everything wrong in BB and he sucks so hard he probably is the reason you lost your game. Bla bla some more complaints about my arena bla bla my team plays no defense, bla bla too much fouling, bla bla cup is too long etc etc. Coco am I forgetting anything?

This Post:
00
200205.62 in reply to 200205.59
Date: 11/6/2011 2:54:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
And I'm still not sure I understand your point. The pp100 factors in everyones skills and minutes, does it not? So everything being as it is, my being down 33 at one point still seems laughable.

No, because the ratings *include* the 4th quarter. Her final ratings are the average of 2.5-3 really good quarters and 1-1.5 quarters of really bad play (from those dreadful backups... 12 min of a 3k SF?? wow). So even though the final ones look similar, if you could see those ratings after 3 quarters, they'd probably look pretty lopsided. That 4th quarter dragged her ratings down quite a bit, and not coincidentally, allowed you to make it much closer.

From: wozzvt

This Post:
00
200205.63 in reply to 200205.61
Date: 11/6/2011 2:56:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
228228
Hey! Its my job to complain around here! No one is going to out complain me!

Ricky Logsdon is the reason for everything wrong in BB and he sucks so hard he probably is the reason you lost your game. Bla bla some more complaints about my arena bla bla my team plays no defense, bla bla too much fouling, bla bla cup is too long etc etc. Coco am I forgetting anything?

Yeah, but we've learned to ignore you by now. It takes time to learn to ignore the new guys!

This Post:
00
200205.64 in reply to 200205.59
Date: 11/6/2011 2:57:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
It's just funny, if I had been the one who won big and been up by over 30 and they were on here complaining,)


thats a terrible strawman cause i wouldnt make that argument based on these results. you're not going to win that game by 10, let alone 30. Your getting hung up about being down 30 based on banger's ratings which are 75% NBBA team and 25% DIII team. IF you back out all the extra possessions and blocked shots that bangers had, maybe its only an average 15 pt win.

But, that didnt happen, you had 10 fewer scoring opportunities and had 6 more shots blocked and were served a 25+ pt deficit until the blowout clowns arrived.


"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
200205.65 in reply to 200205.62
Date: 11/6/2011 3:28:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
Yes, the ratings include the *whole game*. If they played their starters 8 more minutes each, then maybe the pp100 shows they should've had like 93 instead of 88, and maybe me at like 85 instead of 91. But everything considered, the *whole game*, the pp100 showed me slightly ahead.

And did that 4th quarter really drag her ratings down quite a bit? She played the same players in her PL 2 days earlier. Same tactics. Same GS. Same players. More ideal minutes (around 36). Worse ratings. So, don't think her starters were on their way to prominent defense ratings given 8 more minutes of playing time.

Advertisement