BuzzerBeater Forums

AND YOUR ASKING FOR MORE MONEY ARE YOU KIDDING!!!

again and again.
I already replied to this here (152075.551).
Please stop putting in my mouth words I haven't said.

We compete with teams all over the world on the market,because it is one and global,how can you deny this clear fact?
The system allow the small nations to reach the level of the best nation giving them the same incomes of the big countries,while they have less expenses to fight in their counry,giving them room to train their own player,and buying players on the market whithout be forced to temporarily weaken their team,losing game and money form arena incomes.This is a distorsion on the market,that should temporarily exist while they reach the same level of competitivity of the top country,surely related to the userbase
If in italy 1500 teams on 5000 have build so competitive teams to reach the cap,why in a X country,let's say australia,didn't exist 200-250 users able to build so competitive teams to reach the cap?
Till the gap in competitivity will not be closed,the distorsion on the market will still continue to exist,because with the deflation moment and the crazy obscillations of the market,if you have free cash money you are advantaged on the market

the point is,how many time we have to wait till the distorsion end.This situation exist from over 10 seasons,a time in which everyone can build a competitive team for their division(and middly the teams of small countries start from an higher division,so with more economical possibilities than a middly team of the big countriies).And from the words of many users of these country in this thread,they don't seem to need a quickly improvement in their country level of competition,so closing the gap and ending the distorsion against us by the actual economical system
so,ut's fair that we still continue to be disadvantaged on the amerket?what we should do,wait other 30 seasonsk?

The actual differences on the market depends on the different incomes/expenses ratio,because of the deflation period and the crazy oscliattion on the market

That is related to the the different level of competition in various countries,in the way the economic system of BB is build.You don't need to have a huge userbase to have a competitive league,and a good number of competitive teams(thus relating to the userbase)
It is casually the big countries are more competitive.But this means that when you put on the table the problem of competition,and of different incomes/expenses ratio,many users think that is a small country/big country debate and react as it was a form of racism against them,while it isn't

Last edited by Steve Karenn at 8/22/2010 12:47:03 PM

i meant your as in plural not as in you.

The actual differences on the market depends on the different incomes/expenses ratio,because of the deflation period and the crazy oscliattion on the market

okay read my lips: "I don't care about 'the actual differences on the market'. "

therefore: I don't care about what they depend on.

I care about the deflation and its significant consequences. this, in my view, isn't one of them.

I care both of the deflation and of the differences on the market.These are two problem that exist,also if you don't care about it.
And while the deflaction period affects all in the same way,differences on the market doesn't
So,I think that it's primary to solve the differences in the market
Just my two cents

Well, i can see now how this thread got so big, the same things just get reapeated over and over, without coming up with any reasonable proposal for solution, which i don't even consider a problem. As such my responses still stand.

there is no solution as there is no problem

But it is a problem that you cant get money for your players, while normally everybody did in the past.

Problem will happen if the prices will go up again, because there will be a huge volume of users which will profit just from the situation.

I think that is good perspective that the logic around clubs finances is going mostly around the wages. The market value is there something in advance, which create difference between unusual players and these which usual are.

So the point is that there is possible that in the future will be players so cheap that teams pick will be based mostly just on the wage. This stadium is in my opinion ideal, because will avoid to make a business from just buing/selling players. In advance will be drafted players even more profitable and if you will not sell your player after he turns 27, you will not be financially punished.