BuzzerBeater Forums

I think you lost the game on TIE despite them playing 2-3 defense (and you having more rebounds!). TIE lowers offensive effort, so there you go.

A very similar game was mine from tuesday:

(39910764)

I had the upper hand in Match ratings, points per 100 possessions and HCA...but had enth. of only 6 entering the game. Season is still long though and when we build our enthusiasm, everything will be fine

Last edited by Koperboy at 11/10/2011 2:34:05 AM

Thanks LA! I thought it was that. I'll get them next time since they don't know to much about the game since it their first full season.

What happened?? (39831639)

Home court+ fanatic Pr manager+ more power = Lose...

I think you are underestimating offensive flow a lot. Your SG and SF didn't produce even one (1) assist. Your first PG had only 5. When three outside players produce 5 assists combined in a slow tactic like Low post which requires good ball handling and especially passing, something is bound to go wrong. I also think 3-2 is not a good tactic against R&G or any other outside tactic because opposing players will find holes in your defense and shoot at times over your PF or C. Look at numuber of fouls from your inside players and how many FTs had their inside players. Something's not right, is it? Your PF and C fouled mostly their outside players.

It's true your opponent didn't have a stellar %FG (32-85), but that's mostly because of 0-12 from his PF. His three outside players shot 24-55 , which is a decent %FG for R&G. Your outside players, on other hand, couldn't get the ball to your bigs inside and chose to either drive or shoot midrange jumpers and a few 3s - a lot of them probably in last seconds of their attack phase, where players are very imprecise. Your opponent's outside defense was good so he could stop your outside players easily.

what is yours opinion about this match : http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/39887163/boxscore.aspx

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/39666624/boxscore.aspx

Please tell me how I lost this game?? I know I had week od but His os vs my od was 6-4
My is was 7 vs his is was 4 I outrated him in scoring in 4 out of 5 positions....

Turnovers and free throws would of made a big difference... but I still expected a win even with him going normal vs my tie

Turnovers assists and steals could have been the problem

Your perimeter defense is pretty low, he had 17 more possessions than you, he put more effort, you missed nearly half of your 30 FTs, you had 18 turnovers... your nice sides just better rebounding. Yes, you deserve to lose. I was surprised you weren't even completely blown away.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/42168362/boxscore.aspx)

Why such a high lost?

:/

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/42168362/boxscore.aspx)

Why such a high lost?

:/

Passing, OD and the 2-3.

You had 13 assists / 19 TOs. Your opponent had 31 assists to 6 TOs.

Your opponent from the SG and SF positions had 66 points on 26 of 42 shooting.

The 2-3 defense made it simple for those players to put up that kind of number, since your perimeter defense rating was awful, and you didn't have enough flow to generate enough easy buckets yourself to keep up.