BuzzerBeater Forums

i meant your as in plural not as in you.

The actual differences on the market depends on the different incomes/expenses ratio,because of the deflation period and the crazy oscliattion on the market

okay read my lips: "I don't care about 'the actual differences on the market'. "

therefore: I don't care about what they depend on.

I care about the deflation and its significant consequences. this, in my view, isn't one of them.

I care both of the deflation and of the differences on the market.These are two problem that exist,also if you don't care about it.
And while the deflaction period affects all in the same way,differences on the market doesn't
So,I think that it's primary to solve the differences in the market
Just my two cents

Well, i can see now how this thread got so big, the same things just get reapeated over and over, without coming up with any reasonable proposal for solution, which i don't even consider a problem. As such my responses still stand.

there is no solution as there is no problem

But it is a problem that you cant get money for your players, while normally everybody did in the past.

Problem will happen if the prices will go up again, because there will be a huge volume of users which will profit just from the situation.

I think that is good perspective that the logic around clubs finances is going mostly around the wages. The market value is there something in advance, which create difference between unusual players and these which usual are.

So the point is that there is possible that in the future will be players so cheap that teams pick will be based mostly just on the wage. This stadium is in my opinion ideal, because will avoid to make a business from just buing/selling players. In advance will be drafted players even more profitable and if you will not sell your player after he turns 27, you will not be financially punished.

we are all aware of your point of view, thank you.

And, if I understand it, you're not going to do anything because, from your point of view, the problem does not exist. Correct?

The deflation isn't up for debate here. I thought this was about the smaller countries having an 'advantage'.

The system allow the small nations to reach the level of the best nation giving them the same incomes of the big countries

If this were not true, this would be unfair on a global scale.

while they have less expenses to fight in their counry,giving them room to train their own player

Who said you can't train your only player? Who is stopping you?

buying players on the market whithout be forced to temporarily weaken their team

What do you mean by this?

if you have free cash money you are advantaged on the market

Well that's the thing. You don't have free cash because you don't need it. Your money is being well spent on salaries. Even if we have less money so you can win a bid on a player. Then what? Wait till salaries cripple your team.

so,ut's fair that we still continue to be disadvantaged on the amerket?what we should do,wait other 30 seasonsk?

I don't see why you need more players though? If you don't make enough to buy the player, how do you support the salary?
Well I'll post my economy page and you post yours. Let's really see where this money is coming and going from.

Baseline Weekly Economy
Expenses Revenue
Player Salaries: $ 124 515 Attendance: $ 182 454
Staff Salaries: $ 40 775 Merchandise: $ 35 007
Scouting: $ 5 000 TV Contract: $ 74 502
Total: $ 170 290 Total: $ 291 963
Typical Weekly Net Income: $ 121 673

League Averages from Last Week
Expenses Revenue
Player Salaries: $ 109 396 Attendance: $ 142 023
Staff Salaries: $ 66 542 Merchandise: $ 34 118
Scouting: $ 11 666 TV Contract: $ 74 502
Total: $ 187 604 Total: $ 250 643
League Average Net Income: $ 63 039

What do you expect seeing a III league Italian economy?
The big difference is in player salaries (even if I earn the same merchandising than you arg
The average player salaries in my division is 420k/week