BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy and draft

Economy and draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
182720.56 in reply to 182720.55
Date: 5/6/2011 2:18:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Why can't survive a topic that talk seriously about economy,without OT/trolling?Sigh

This Post:
22
182720.58 in reply to 182720.57
Date: 5/6/2011 3:45:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
699699
tut tut tut tut

Off-topic wisdom is necessary, young guns. It's like yin and yang. It rises together with on-topic baloney until the thread reaches quiescence and harmony.

From: ned

This Post:
00
182720.60 in reply to 182720.59
Date: 5/10/2011 7:19:42 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
My messages are sometimes coded. They relate to the topic in ways that only the true followers can understand. Everyone else will be dust when the Big One hits.


That's why you're a GM
Chuck approved!

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
11
182720.62 in reply to 182720.61
Date: 5/12/2011 4:35:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
One thing that I think you and maybe a lot of other people mistakenly believe is that GMs have some sort of say in the development of the game. There might be one or two who are in the loop, but the vast majority of GMs are just regular users who help out with the administration of the game.

having 1-3 buys of overpaying retardedly high for rookies to train u21/nt with their 4man roster of 1k salary scrubs, and logging on once every 2-3 weeks so they dont go bot and to switch up training..but from what I have heard, having a 10+ season account without a single buy ever or just 1 or 2 in lifetime, sporadically logging in to switch training is very allowable.


Why shouldn't it be? Is it unrealistic and ridiculous that a team can make 250+ transfers in 6 seasons? Should that be looked at and regulated as well? What is the acceptable number of transfers per year per team? I think that erring on the side of laissez-faire is better than being draconian.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
182720.63 in reply to 182720.61
Date: 5/13/2011 4:58:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404


What you dont understand is, farm teams are perfectly legal in this game (unfortunately).

What do you don't understand is that the problem in some kind of purchase is not on the buyer side,but on seller's adversaries side

I could not care less about the fact that a farm team want to buy a young player for 100M;I'm concerned about the fact that the seller,a my rival or potentially a my rival,can have 100M to spend on the market when he don't deserve it and didn't do anything to deserve it

That's the point,period

This Post:
11
182720.64 in reply to 182720.11
Date: 5/13/2011 8:26:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
244244
I feel like making the tv contracts/ attendance and whatnot more reflective of league strength instead of just what division you are in would help some.

This Post:
00
182720.66 in reply to 182720.65
Date: 5/14/2011 12:55:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
I think this is completely fine. Teams who do poorly have a chance to improve their fortunes with a great draft pick. Why is that wrong? Having 4 million to spend and spending it wisely are two different things, and even if they do spend it wisely and promote, good for them. It only proves that the draft system, namely giving the teams that do poorly an opportunity to improve through getting a great draftee, works.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
Advertisement