Regarding the question of how BaO tactics works, I missed the older thread, but Marin's explaination had a major problem here:
Take a look at this game: (http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/52648247/boxscore.aspx)
I tried a Outside Box and One tactics, expecting my PG who had a 16 OD to pickup the best perimeter threats from the opposition team. Instead, looking at the Play-By-Play, apparently my PF (who is configured to defend C in my tactics) took on the assignment to exclusively defending the opposition SG. This seriously doesn't make sense...
My PF has a OD of 7, with ID at 13 and SB at 12 - He should not be the the outside stopper!
Just to make the case more clear, I had 5 players playing for the game, with the corrsponding skill lvls in OD, ID, SB being:
PG: 16, 9, 1
SG: 9, 7, 1
SF: 12, 10, 8
PF: 7, 13,12
C: 10, 14, 8
The game happened at the start of the season, so everyone was having GS 7:
Can someone explain how did the Engine chose my PF to defend SG in this case? Many many thanks if someone could enlighten me regarding this -- Have puzzled me for over a month now.
I can throw out some wild guesses. I love WAGs.
Maybe it's the shotblocking? Perhaps the highest shotblocking is the one that's most likely to be able to get over to the target player in time, and in theory at least most likely to block the shot once it's taken.
The only other thing I have is the theory that the "and one" guy can't be one of the two players who will be on the side of the box that the defense focuses on (i.e., for outside box and one, the PG and SG will already be guarding the outside so the best of the other three is selected). So maybe, and this is a really wild ass guess, if you had your SF set to defend at SG and your SG at another position, the 7 OD + 12 SB was enough to make him a better choice for outside defense than the 9+1 of the SG or 10+8 of the center.
Mind you, this is just me trying to fit the data and the little I've observed before into something even remotely logically consistent. Whether it does behave this way or not is in doubt enough, let alone the more basic of concept of *should* it behave this way.