BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New Feature: Secondary Staff

New Feature: Secondary Staff

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
294450.57 in reply to 294450.55
Date: 6/24/2018 4:08:28 PM
Delaware 87ers
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
308308
Yes you can have more than one of the new staff at the same time. I was able to hire both the Psychologist and Nutritionist and both are showing up on my staff page now.

This Post:
00
294450.58 in reply to 294450.57
Date: 6/24/2018 4:57:25 PM
Spartan 300
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
52555255
Second Team:
Spartan Kids
Yes you can have more than one of the new staff at the same time. I was able to hire both the Psychologist and Nutritionist and both are showing up on my staff page now.
The reason I'm asking is that I can't find nowhere the button "Hire" that you have without the new staff.

I only see this find replacement button, and we know what replace means, to bring a new one instead of the old staff member...
(http://pokit.org/get/img/3295364e7ff2a661790ee815c75f7ecf...)

There should be definitely a "Hire" at the bottom of the page for the new Secondary Staff.

This is where we hold them!
This Post:
00
294450.59 in reply to 294450.58
Date: 6/24/2018 5:39:50 PM
Bègles Eagles
IV.25
Overall Posts Rated:
116116
Yesterday I hired a youth coach and not replace my coach but apparently my main coach is missing.

I make the difference between the button replace his main coach and hire "secondary staff, secondary coach" but here I am with a replacement and not an additional job for 18/19 years.

Who can help me on this nasty bug.




This Post:
11
294450.60 in reply to 294450.31
Date: 6/24/2018 5:52:09 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
i'm not sure why this feature was released right before the playoffs, especially with this new guy who promises us good game shape no matter what

also, how this guy differs from the current staff member that is already supposed to help us with game shape? do their abilities stack?

This Post:
22
294450.63 in reply to 294450.1
Date: 6/24/2018 8:37:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3232
As for me, it makes sense that these staff should be included, whereas, since they were called 'Secondary Staff', should they earn as much as 'Primary Staff'? It is obviously a heavy burden for small teams and potentially, it might widen the gap in between of teams that in different divisions.

This Post:
77
294450.64 in reply to 294450.63
Date: 6/25/2018 1:26:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11011101
I have different feelings about this. First of all I think it's a hidden way to let some money go out from the game. At least as the main porpouse.
Second thought is that since it has been classified minor it should not have so much impact.
About staff:
- nutritionist: I like! Stamina is really painful since the meaningless drop even in younger player is something bothering. Something to reduce it is really welcome.
- psycho: neutral feeling since I think it will operate on the random factor and it's not a buy shape thing. Less random but your minutes should be good too
- youth guy: don't like it at all. Many players can be capped already during their 4 seasons. If you train good you can produce tons of good players without adding something already. Any change which can help to make training easier or faster is something I don't appreciate. Training must cost energy, weeks, a good plan. Not always pay more train more train fast and so on.

My 2 cents on this. But the effort is great and really appreciated guys.

Last edited by NdR619 - Pilipinas U21 at 6/25/2018 1:27:17 AM

From: drama7

This Post:
55
294450.65 in reply to 294450.64
Date: 6/25/2018 4:24:24 AM
Sant Mateu
ACBB
Overall Posts Rated:
27662766
Second Team:
Minuto 92:48

I also have different feelings.

I like and appreciate the effort of renewing the game, but I think the improvements have been made in some unnecessary aspects. The novelty of the resistance is right, those drops are painful and for the teams that train players it bothers us a lot to have to stop training to give that training.

But what I really do not like are two things:

1- The moment of the announcement and its entry into force in the middle of a season, with all that that implies.

2- The plus in training for players 18 and 19 years. Not for the idea itself, but for the moment of entry into force, for example it could have been like this: "in season 44 will begin to integrate a new type of coach for players 18 and 19 years." I think it is a GREAT INJUSTICE for those managers that this season or the previous one made a large outlay to sign 18-year-old draft players. Surely they thought, "Well, I'm going to rebuild the team and I'll do it with 3 top prospects, which together with the level 6 or 7 coach that I just bought, will make me have no rival in the national team within 10 seasons." But no, because now with that youth coach any player of a younger year, can easily improve with those 2 season of training.

That's why I think this entry into force right now, and not having announced it to begin in two seasons.

Advertisement