Hey Reddaddy32...While I agree that these ratings show that Lebron has indeed contributed to many victories, you have to question the value of those wins though. What did those wins do for Cleveland? Lebron has yet to win a real meaningful playoff series, and really hasn't won a single series that they weren't expected to win. Lebron leads the players in la-di-da victoriers. You can put me on a Middle school team, and I can lead them and help them win all kinds of games, but I dont show up for the playoffs, then how meaningful were the victories? That example is a bit of a stretch, but what Cleveland has done over the last few seasons that few teams do, is show up EVERY single night...as a result they always beat the teams they should beat...Whereas teams like the Lakers, Spurs, Celtics take nights off, and pretty much just win when they really want to. Lebron needs to win something meaningful before he is deemed MVP. I think Kevin Durant is much more valuable because at his age, and the youth on that team, he led them places they had NO business being. Cleveland sucks without Lebron, but they could still make the playoffs without him in the East. OKC had zero chance without Durants efforts. I am not saying that Durant should be MVP, but you can make cases like this where players justifiy MVP consideration more than others.
Bottom line though, is the way I value the MVP, and the way you do, and the next guy, and one voter compared to another is different. So until they come up with a difinitive definition of what they MVP award is actually supposed to reward, we will always have these kinds of debates.