BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The Great Micro-nation Debate

The Great Micro-nation Debate

Set priority
Show messages by
From: GrFlur

This Post:
33
278268.588 in reply to 278268.585
Date: 4/22/2016 8:28:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
592592

...

Says a guy who doesn't even PLAY in a small nation (SMH moment, right there). SAME AS IT IS NOW, DUDE. SAME AS IT WOULD BE IF THEY MERGED NATIONS. Seeing as you don't know, I'll explain: you play at the next spot available.


So me being part of a large comunity of players makes you uncomfortable

Well... I'm sorry but get over it

In Utopia have been lateral movement because there is NO COUNTRY limitation

I'm ok with the "next spot available" but do not "encapsule" Divisions by "country" as you were saying

And of course this is the general forum, if you don't want others givieng their opinions about what you worte, stop writting


Howl to the Moon, you won't regret it.
From: jonte

This Post:
00
278268.589 in reply to 278268.586
Date: 4/22/2016 9:04:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
925925
I
Why would that occur? For a start - it's in all likelihood impossible to do that within current BB structures.
There are a few ways you could structure this...

Let's say - for ease - only one super league in Asia - a conglomerate of: Sth Korea, Thailand, Japan, Vietnam (again reiterating: this is for example's sake).
You could...
[1]- have direct relegation/promotion based on nation (lowest finisher relegates, regardless).
[2]- make it simply on ranking, disregarding nation entirely, but drawing on those 4 to provide the highest world rankings in that region - they play in the Div 1.
[3]- Have a relegation game during the playoffs, where lowest Div 1 team per nation plays against a team that would promote - winner goes/stays in Div 1.

Lots of ways that national identity could occur, without going the Utopian route.


That are some valid ideas.

[1] could work in merged leagues with less than 4-6 countries. If you merge more countries you would have to many teams that are in relegation/demote. However we could have very weird scenarios where a high ranked team demotes just because the other team of his nation is even higher. Still I think this in combination with [3] is the way to go IF such a superleague would be implemented.

two problems this idea does not target are:

-managers of smaller countries would have it easier to promote to the superleague because of weaker competition in the highest national league. a guy, who has been champion for many seasons in his country in the old system, could just stay in the regional/continential league forever in your system, because he would always win the relegation game against very weak opponents.

- new managers would still have very few competition on the same level if they only start with other users from the same country (which would be in many cases equal starting alone!). If you also merge lower leagues new managers would start together with the few new managers other micronations have. This is in my opinion the most important benefit of a merge.

please don't ignore my arguments just because I play in a large nation (which would be ad hominem, too) and think about it ;)

This Post:
11
278268.590 in reply to 278268.588
Date: 4/22/2016 9:13:50 AM
Shahin.Boushehr
Bartar
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
The idea of having a top regional league (like Asia I) and then national lower divisions won't work .There would be the promotion/demotion problem. What has been suggested here is that the lowest team in the Div I will play the highest team in the national Div, like a relegation game .

First of all, how would the top regional league get structured ? Which teams would be put into it ? like maybe 1 from each country !? And then there would be only 1 spot in the top league for Iran for example. This would not work, as there maybe 3 or 4 teams (just an example) in Iran who deserve to be in the top league. A team in the lower national division may be much stronger than a team from another country which is in the top regional division, but he/she can't get promoted because he/she is stuck behind a very strong team from his own country which is in the top regional division.

This Post:
11
278268.591 in reply to 278268.576
Date: 4/22/2016 10:50:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
Some ideas...
- Having top leagues as a local conglomerate...
- Having a second tier for smaller nations ...

...

From reading here, it seems like the majority of those who are *for* this move are from nations that it doesn't even impact. Those from smaller nations seem to be split, but the majority (certainly not vast) tend to not want the straight-Utopian-merge, but something which allows them to participate in what *could* be the best of both worlds.

My main concern is that this is merely a bandaid over a gaping wound, with the lifeblood of BB pouring out. Anyone who sees this as the primary concern for Buzzerbeater at the moment isn't seeing the forest for the trees.

Conglomerate on top, retain the small nation advantages for everyone else ... what a great idea for retaining the financial advantages of small nations. It is no wonder the small nations would like that idea; it keeps the very imbalance that a "merge" is designed to level out.

As far as nations that would not be impacted by even the smallest reshuffle, here is the entire list:
1. ___

We are all in this together and even the slightest reshuffle would impact everyone, at least financially.

You're right in your final paragraph. Of that there can be no doubt. Anything less than a complete reshuffle is nothing but a bandaid, or as I have said, rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

This Post:
11
278268.592 in reply to 278268.591
Date: 4/22/2016 11:51:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532

Some ideas...
- Having top leagues as a local conglomerate...
- Having a second tier for smaller nations ...

...

From reading here, it seems like the majority of those who are *for* this move are from nations that it doesn't even impact. Those from smaller nations seem to be split, but the majority (certainly not vast) tend to not want the straight-Utopian-merge, but something which allows them to participate in what *could* be the best of both worlds.

My main concern is that this is merely a bandaid over a gaping wound, with the lifeblood of BB pouring out. Anyone who sees this as the primary concern for Buzzerbeater at the moment isn't seeing the forest for the trees.

Conglomerate on top, retain the small nation advantages for everyone else ... what a great idea for retaining the financial advantages of small nations. It is no wonder the small nations would like that idea; it keeps the very imbalance that a "merge" is designed to level out.

As far as nations that would not be impacted by even the smallest reshuffle, here is the entire list:
1. ___

We are all in this together and even the slightest reshuffle would impact everyone, at least financially.

You're right in your final paragraph. Of that there can be no doubt. Anything less than a complete reshuffle is nothing but a bandaid, or as I have said, rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

"We're all in this together"... yet here *you* are, telling us what our experience is.
Quoting BBRyan in the initial post of this thread...
- We welcome the opinion of everyone, but understand that we are most concerned with the opinions of those that will be directly affected by any potential change. That means the managers from micro-nations.
- If you're not a manager from a micro-nation, please don't attempt to speak on the behalf of those that are.


"...what a great idea for retaining the financial advantages of small nations." - overplayed, dude. I really don't think you have the slightest idea of the "financials" of a small nation team.

"...it keeps the very imbalance that a "merge" is designed to level out." - erm, say what? You're saying that the primary reason for a proposed merge is to "level the playing field"? Where was that mentioned?

"rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic." - yet you're advocating something that would alienate even more members...

Last edited by malice at 4/22/2016 12:12:33 PM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
From: malice

This Post:
00
278268.593 in reply to 278268.588
Date: 4/22/2016 11:53:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532

...

Says a guy who doesn't even PLAY in a small nation (SMH moment, right there). SAME AS IT IS NOW, DUDE. SAME AS IT WOULD BE IF THEY MERGED NATIONS. Seeing as you don't know, I'll explain: you play at the next spot available.


So me being part of a large comunity of players makes you uncomfortable

Well... I'm sorry but get over it

In Utopia have been lateral movement because there is NO COUNTRY limitation

I'm ok with the "next spot available" but do not "encapsule" Divisions by "country" as you were saying

And of course this is the general forum, if you don't want others givieng their opinions about what you worte, stop writting


Well... to be honest (sorry!), I'm not overly concerned with your opinion, as you're not even from a smaller nation. I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but you're not really of the experience to tell us what we should be thinking, or what the best experience for BB should be for us.

I do think that the *financial benefits* that people from large nations keep pointing to is highly overrated, and for the most part: false. If it were so, wouldn't the majority of BB's top teams be from smaller nations?

Last edited by malice at 4/22/2016 12:14:29 PM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
11
278268.594 in reply to 278268.588
Date: 4/22/2016 11:53:11 AM
Lokomotive Coma
Bundesliga
Overall Posts Rated:
314314
Second Team:
Lokomotive Coma Utopia
And of course this is the general forum, if you don't want others givieng their opinions about what you worte, stop writting


First posting - BB-Ryan

- We welcome the opinion of everyone, but understand that we are most concerned with the opinions of those that will be directly affected by any potential change. That means the managers from micro-nations.
- If you're not a manager from a micro-nation, please don't attempt to speak on the behalf of those that are.

Ois wiad guat
From: malice

This Post:
00
278268.595 in reply to 278268.589
Date: 4/22/2016 12:02:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532

please don't ignore my arguments just because I play in a large nation (which would be ad hominem, too) and think about it ;)

Not ad hominem. You simply don't share the same experience as those in smaller nations, nor does the cessation of those nations completely and utterly impact you in the slightest. It really does come across as the members of bigger nations telling us what our experience in BB is/should be.
You can *have* an opinion, but don't be insulted if I devalue it somewhat compared to people sharing said experience. Still jonte... at least you're *trying* (unlike some others here who simply yell: MERGE!).

The issue with "new managers", at least from people I've spoken to (I once had 5 of my students sign up - and all quit for this very reason), isn't the lack of competition - it's that at the very first they are competing with teams significantly better than them. Success early on matters.

Last edited by malice at 4/22/2016 12:03:13 PM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
278268.597 in reply to 278268.596
Date: 4/22/2016 12:09:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Ball for you sir.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
Advertisement