Now you are being petty. In spite of my disagreements with you over alot of things, i always thought you were at least a decent guy in hattrick and here.
How do you figure I'm being petty?
As for the infamous patient offense game, i had no intention of winning the game.
An important part of NT play, given the small number of games in a given round, is to be able to effectively judge whether or not you can win a game, or whether or not you need to win a game.
The 1st Round of the Worlds played out perfectly in that regard:
- Loss to Australia
- Must win against Italy, played a CT and won by 2
- Punted game against Iran as it was not a game that would determine advancement or any 2nd round records
- Beat Morocco on an obvious TIE
- Beat Germany with a Normal and a 2-3 Zone (against advice of many - one of the few times I've done that but I felt was absolutely necessary, and it was) to ensure a 2-1 record for the beginning of the 2nd round. A loss there and the subsequent events leaves us out of the semis.
Also, our last 2nd round game against Argentina was essentially a must-win, but we were able to TIE comfortably.
Would you be able to read the situation for 4-5 games and and possibly beyond and adapt each game plan to that, while adjusting on the fly as other games affect the needs of the USA?
lastly, the south americans being the incident where you gt baited because they beat you with a foolish CT.
Who? Do they even exist? I have no idea who this team is, but I remember about 50 seasons ago when Brazil actually mattered. Maybe this has to do with that, perhaps?
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live